Cited by 144Respiratory Support and MechanismsObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Time of non-invasive ventilation

Nava, Stefano, Navalesi, Paolo, Conti, Giorgio·2006·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a safe, versatile and effective technique that can avert side effects and complications associated with endotracheal intubation. The success of NIV relies on several factors, including the type and severity of acute respiratory failure, the underlying disease, the location of treatment, and the experience of the team. The time factor is also important. NIV is primarily used to avert the need for endotracheal intubation in patients with early-stage acute respiratory failure and post-extubation respiratory failure. It can also be used as an alternative to invasive ventilation at a more advanced stage of acute respiratory failure or to facilitate the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation. NIV has been used to prevent development of acute respiratory failure or post-extubation respiratory failure. The number of days of NIV and hours of daily use differ, depending on the severity and course of the acute respiratory failure and the timing of application. In this review article, we analyse, compare and discuss the results of studies in which NIV was applied at various times during the evolution of acute respiratory failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nava, S., Navalesi, P., & Conti, G.
Affiliations
  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Navalesi, Paolo
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2006-02-14
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
361-370
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2081743814
Cited by
144
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
non-invasive ventilation, timing of ventilation initiation, acute respiratory failure, post-extubation respiratory failure, weaning from mechanical ventilation, endotracheal intubation avoidance
MeSH terms
Humans, Intensive Care Units, Intubation, Intratracheal, Italy, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Insufficiency, Ventilator Weaning, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review