Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy

Open access
Pranskunas, Andrius, Koopmans, Matty, Koetsier, Peter M., Pilvinis, Vidas, Boerma, E. Christiaan·2013·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of sublingual microcirculatory flow alterations, according to a predefined arbitrary cutoff value, in patients with "clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion". Secondary endpoints were the changes in microvascular flow index (MFI), "clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion", and stroke volume (SV) after fluid administration, and the differences between groups. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, observational study in a 22-bed mixed intensive care unit (ICU). Patients ≥18 years with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and "clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion" as the principal reason for fluid administration were included. Before and after fluid challenge, systemic hemodynamics and direct in vivo observation of the sublingual microcirculation with sidestream dark-field imaging were obtained. Microvascular flow index (MFI) <2.6 was predefined as abnormal. RESULTS: N = 50. At baseline, MFI <2.6 was present in 66 % of the patients. In these patients, MFI increased from 2.3 (2-2.5) at baseline to 2.5 (2.1-2.8) after fluid challenge (p = 0.003). This was accompanied by a reduction in the number of "clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion" from 2 (1-2) to 1 (0-2) (p < 0.001). However, in patients with MFI >2.6 at baseline, MFI and clinical signs changed insignificantly [2.8 (2.8-2.9) versus 2.8 (2.7-3), p = 0.45, respectively, 1 (1-2) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.32]. These changes were not restricted to patients with a rise in SV ≥10 %. CONCLUSIONS: These data add to the understanding that noninvasive assessment of microvascular blood flow may help to identify patients eligible for fluid therapy, and to evaluate its effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-012-2793-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Pranskunas, A., Koopmans, M., Koetsier, P. M., Pilvinis, V., & Boerma, E. C.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2012-12-20
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
612-619
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2114346022
Cited by
174
References
1
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00134-012-2793-8
The paper
Pranskunas, A., Koopmans, M., Koetsier, P. M., Pilvinis, V., & Boerma, E. C. (2013). Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2793-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.