Cited by 88Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesNosocomial Infections in ICU

Early enteral nutrition for cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide inpatient database study

Ohbe, Hiroyuki, Jo, Taisuke, Yamana, Hayato, Matsui, Hiroki, Fushimi, Kiyohide, Yasunaga, Hideo·2018·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Despite extensive research on enteral nutrition (EN) for patients in shock, it remains unclear whether this should be postponed in patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). In this study, we aimed to compare outcomes of early and delayed EN for patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring VA-ECMO. Methods In this retrospective database study drawing on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2016, we identified patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock who had received VA-ECMO for more than 2 days. We allocated the patients to two groups: those who received EN within 2 days (early) or 3 days or more (delayed) after starting VA-ECMO. We then used a marginal structural model to analyze associations between early EN and various outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality. Results We identified 1769 eligible patients during the 69-month study period, 220 of whom (12%) received early EN. After using a marginal structural model to adjust for baseline and time-dependent confounders, we found that the early EN group showed significantly lower in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.62-0.98, P = 0.032] and lower 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.97, P = 0.031) than the delayed EN group. Conclusions According to this retrospective database study, early EN is not associ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-018-5319-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohbe, H., Jo, T., Yamana, H., Matsui, H., Fushimi, K., & Yasunaga, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohbe, Hiroyuki
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2018-07-20
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
1258-1265
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2883893092
Cited by
88
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (H29-Policy-Designated-009, H29-ICT-Genral-004)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (17H04141)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
enteral nutrition, cardiogenic shock, obstructive shock, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, early enteral nutrition, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, mechanical circulatory support, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Cardiogenic, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review