Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 169 of the 169 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Open access
Vlaar, Alexander P., Oczkowski, Simon, de Bruin, Sanne, Wijnberge, Marije, Antonelli, Massimo, Aubron, Cecile, Aries, Philippe, Duranteau, Jacques, Juffermans, Nicole P., Meier, Jens, Murphy, Gavin J., Abbasciano, Riccardo, Muller, Marcella, Shah, Akshay, Perner, Anders, Rygaard, Sofie, Walsh, Timothy S., Guyatt, Gordon, Dionne, J. C., Cecconi, Maurizio·2020·Intensive Care Medicine
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations regarding transfusion practices in non-bleeding, critically ill adults. Design A task force involving 13 international experts and three methodologists used the GRADE approach for guideline development. Methods The task force identified four main topics: red blood cell transfusion thresholds, red blood cell transfusion avoidance strategies, platelet transfusion, and plasma transfusion. The panel developed structured guideline questions using population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Results The task force generated 16 clinical practice recommendations (3 strong recommendations, 13 conditional recommendations), and identified five PICOs with insufficient evidence to make any recommendation. Conclusions This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and identifies areas where further research is needed regarding transfusion practices and transfusion avoidance in non-bleeding, critically ill adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 169 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Vlaar, A. P., Oczkowski, S., de Bruin, S., Wijnberge, M., Antonelli, M., Aubron, C., Aries, P., Duranteau, J., Juffermans, N. P., Meier, J., Murphy, G. J., Abbasciano, R., Muller, M., Shah, A., Perner, A., Rygaard, S., Walsh, T. S., Guyatt, G., Dionne, J. C., & Cecconi, M.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
673-696
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
DOI
10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8
OpenAlex
W2996921150
Cited by
284
References
169
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8
The paper
Vlaar, A. P., Oczkowski, S., de Bruin, S., Wijnberge, M., Antonelli, M., Aubron, C., Aries, P., Duranteau, J., Juffermans, N. P., Meier, J., Murphy, G. J., Abbasciano, R., Muller, M., Shah, A., Perner, A., Rygaard, S., Walsh, T. S., Guyatt, G., Dionne, J. C., & Cecconi, M. (2020). Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.