Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia

Open access
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio, Torres, Antoni, Nagavci, Blin, Aliberti, Stefano, Antonelli, Massimo, Bassetti, Matteo, Bos, Lieuwe D., Chalmers, James D., Derde, Lennie, de Waele, Jan, Garnacho-Montero, Jose, Kollef, Marin, Luna, Carlos M., Menendez, Rosario, Niederman, Michael S., Ponomarev, Dmitry, Restrepo, Marcos I., Rigau, David, Schultz, Marcus J., Weiss, Emmanuel, Welte, Tobias, Wunderink, Richard·2023·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and whilst European and non-European guidelines are available for community-acquired pneumonia, there are no specific guidelines for sCAP. Methods The European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), and Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) launched a task force to develop the first international guidelines for sCAP. The panel comprised a total of 18 European and four non-European experts, as well as two methodologists. Eight clinical questions for sCAP diagnosis and treatment were chosen to be addressed. Systematic literature searches were performed in several databases. Meta-analyses were performed for evidence synthesis, whenever possible. The quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to decide on the direction and strength of recommendations. Results Recommendations issued were related to diagnosis, antibiotics, organ support, biomarkers and co-adjuvant therapy. After considering the confidence in effect estimates, the importance of outcomes studied, desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention and implications to health equity, recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions. Conclusions In these international guidelines, ERS, ESICM, ESCMID, and ALAT provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for diagnosis, empirical treatment, and antibiotic therapy for sCAP, following the GRADE approach. Furthermore, current knowledge gaps have been highlighted and recommendations for future research have been made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-023-07033-8

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Metadata

Authors
Martin-Loeches, I., Torres, A., Nagavci, B., Aliberti, S., Antonelli, M., Bassetti, M., Bos, L. D., Chalmers, J. D., Derde, L., de Waele, J., Garnacho-Montero, J., Kollef, M., Luna, C. M., Menendez, R., Niederman, M. S., Ponomarev, D., Restrepo, M. I., Rigau, D., Schultz, M. J., Weiss, E., Welte, T., & Wunderink, R.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2023-04-04
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
615-632
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W4362521337
Cited by
316
References
94
FWCI
52.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00134-023-07033-8
The paper
Martin-Loeches, I., Torres, A., Nagavci, B., Aliberti, S., Antonelli, M., Bassetti, M., Bos, L. D., Chalmers, J. D., Derde, L., de Waele, J., Garnacho-Montero, J., Kollef, M., Luna, C. M., Menendez, R., Niederman, M. S., Ponomarev, D., Restrepo, M. I., Rigau, D., Schultz, M. J., . . . Wunderink, R. (2023). ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07033-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.