The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a logistic regression model that predicts the risk of death for children less than 16 years of age in intensive care, using information collected at the time of admission to the unit. DESIGN: Three prospective cohort studies, from 1988 to 1995, were used to determine the variables for the final model. A fourth cohort study, from 1994 to 1996, collected information from consecutive admissions to all seven dedicated paediatric intensive care units in Australia and one in Britain. RESULTS: 2904 patients were included in the first three parts of the study, which identified ten variables for further evaluation. 5695 children were in the fourth part of the study (including 1412 from the third part); a model that used eight variables was developed on data from four of the units and tested on data from the other four units. The model fitted the test data well (deciles of risk goodness-of-fit test p = 0.40) and discriminated well between death and survival (area under the receiver operating characteristic plot 0.90). The final PIM model used the data from all 5695 children and also fitted well (p = 0.37) and discriminated well (area 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Scores that use the worst value of their predictor variables in the first 12-24 h should not be used to compare different units: patients mismanaged in a bad unit will have higher scores than similar patients managed in a good unit, and the bad unit's high mortality rate will be incorrectly attributed to its having sicker patients. PIM is a simple model that is based on only eight explanatory variables collected at the time of admission to intensive care. It is accurate enough to be used to describe the risk of mortality in groups of children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118548387 · Cited by 13,861
Clinical Prediction Rules: Applications and Methodological Standards
Wasson, J. H., Sox, H. C., Neff, R. K., & Goldman, L. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198509263131306 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
Straney, L., Clements, A., Parslow, R. C., Pearson, G., Shann, F., Alexander, J., & Slater, A. (2013) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0b013e31829760cf · Cited by 503
Self-citationThe Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score: Update 2015*
Pollack, M. M., Holubkov, R., Funai, T., Dean, J. M., Berger, J. T., Wessel, D. L., Meert, K., Berg, R. A., Newth, C. J. L., Harrison, R. E., et al. (2016) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000000558 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Shann, F., Pearson, G., Slater, A., & Wilkinson, K.
- Venue
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-207
- ISSN
- 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1238
- OpenAlex
- W2123599545
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s001340050317
- The paper
- Shann, F., Pearson, G., Slater, A., & Wilkinson, K. (1997). Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.