Cited by 67Ethics and Social Impacts of AICOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

COVID-19, artificial intelligence, ethical challenges and policy implications

Open access
Anshari, Muhammad, Hamdan, Mahani, Ahmad, Norainie, Ali, Emil, Haidi, Hamizah·2023·AI & SOCIETY

Abstract

As the COVID-19 outbreak remains an ongoing issue, there are concerns about its disruption, the level of its disruption, how long this pandemic is going to last, and how innovative technological solutions like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and expert systems can assist to deal with this pandemic. AI has the potential to provide extremely accurate insights for an organization to make better decisions based on collected data. Despite the numerous advantages that may be achieved by AI, the use of AI can be perceived differently by society, where moral and ethical issues may be raised, especially in regards to accessing and exploiting public data gathered from social media platforms. To better comprehend the concerns and ethical challenges, utilitarianism and deontology were used as business ethics frameworks to explore the aforementioned challenges of AI in society. The framework assists in determining whether the AI's deployment is ethically acceptable or not. The paper lays forth policy recommendations for public and private organizations to embrace AI-based decision-making processes to avoid data privacy violations and maintain public trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-022-01471-6

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI innovations such as ChatGPT might challenge privacy, inclusivity, and inequality, bring bias, and raise safety concerns.

    “This study takes as a starting point that AI innovations such as ChatGPT might challenge privacy, inclusivity, and inequality (Anshari et al., 2023;Dignum, 2018;McGee, 2023;Yuste et al., 2017), bring bias (Chen, 2023) and raise safety concerns (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2020;Rozado, 2023;Yigitcanlar et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anderson M (2018) Facebook privacy scandal explained. The Associated Press. Retrieved from https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/facebook-privacy-scandal-explained-1.3874533
  2. Bivins T Mixed Media: Moral Distinctions in Advertising, Public Relations and Journalism 2009 2 New York Routledge
  3. Kant I Paton H The moral law 1948 London Routledge
  4. Mill, John Stuart (1993) Utilitarianis m, In: Williams, Geraint (ed.), John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerati ons of Representativ e Government, Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy, Everyman, London
  5. Morrison H Mujtaba B Strategic philanthropy and maximization of shareholder investment through ethical and values-based leadership in a post enron/anderson debacle J Bus Stud Quarterly 2010 1 4 94 109
  6. O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (First edition). Crown
  7. Vance A (2012) Facebook’s is bigger than yours. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from https://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-08-23/facebooks-is-bigger-than-yours and challenges. IEEE Network, 28(4), 5–13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anshari, M., Hamdan, M., Ahmad, N., Ali, E., & Haidi, H.
Affiliations
Universiti Brunei Darussalam (BN)
Corresponding author
Anshari, Muhammad
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2022-05-19
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
707-720
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4280632587
Cited by
67
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8
FWCI
17.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, artificial intelligence, AI ethics, expert systems, utilitarianism, deontology, business ethics, social media data, data privacy, public trust, AI policy, data-driven decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review