Generative AI, generating precariousness for workers?
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of LLM may result in increased competition among workers in high quality (least precarious) occupations and, in the long term, may contribute to skill obsolescence, dehumanization of work, decreased wages, job insecurity, and polarization in the labor market.
“The result may be an increased competition among workers in high quality (least precarious) occupations and, in the long-term, may contribute to skill obsolescence, dehumanization of work, decreased wages, job insecurity and polarization in the labor market (36, 37).”
From Large language model exposure and precarious occupations: Unpacking relationships in the Canadian labor force (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is a risk that certain jobs in the professional writing industry will essentially disappear as LLM quality improves.
“It is apparent that since LLMs are able to write articles or short stories, as the quality of their inputs gets better and better, there is the risk that certain jobs in the professional writing industry will essentially disappear (Ponce Del Castillo, 2023; Tamkin et al., 2021).”
From On the creativity of large language models (2025) · cites this paper as Ponce Del Castillo, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the creativity of large language models
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02127-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Unveiling Generative AI in Higher Education: Insights from Engineering Students and Professors
Guillén-Yparrea, N., & Hernández-Rodríguez, F. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon60312.2024.10578876 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Jetha, A., Liao, Q., Smith, P., Vu, V., Biswas, A., Smith, B., & Vahid Shahidi, F. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.4312
“The result may be an increased competition among workers in high quality (least precarious) occupations and, in the long-term, may contribute to skill obsoles-cence, dehumanization of work, decreased wages, job insecurity and polarization in the labor market ( 36, 37 ).”
- Authors
- Ponce Del Castillo, A.
- Venue
- AI & SOCIETY
- Published
- 2023-07-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2601-2602
- ISSN
- 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5655
- OpenAlex
- W4384028991
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AI & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Keywords
- generative AI, precarious employment, worker precarity, automation, labor market, job insecurity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
