Cited by 293Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts?

Doepke, Matthias·2005·Journal of Population Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Doepke, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Doepke, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Population Economics
Published
2005-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
337-366
ISSN
  • 0933-1433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1475
OpenAlex
W3121996301
Cited by
293
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 22
FWCI
26.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Population Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
child mortality, fertility decline, total fertility rate, net reproductive rate, number of surviving children, stochastic mortality, infant mortality, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review