Cited by 42Family Dynamics and RelationshipsDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesEconomic Growth and Productivity

Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences

Open access
Bloom, David E., Kuhn, Michael, Prettner, Klaus·2024·Annual Review of Economics

Abstract

High-income countries have generally experienced falling fertility in recent decades. In most of these countries, the total fertility rate is now below the level that implies a stable population in the long run. This has led to concerns among economists, policymakers, and the wider public about the economic consequences of low fertility and population decline. In this contribution, we aim to ( a ) describe the main determinants of low fertility in high-income countries, ( b ) assess its potential economic consequences, ( c ) discuss adjustment mechanisms for individuals and economies, ( d ) propose a simple economic framework to analyze the long-run economic impacts of low fertility, and ( e ) draw lessons for economic policymakers to react appropriately. While the economic challenges of low fertility are substantial, a thoughtful and consistent policy response can mitigate most of the adverse consequences.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

High-income countries have generally experienced falling fertility, with the OECD total fertility rate dropping from 3.29 children per woman in 1960 to 1.63 in 2019 and most countries now below replacement. The review argues that low fertility creates substantial economic challenges, but compensatory mechanisms and a coordinated policy mix can mitigate most adverse consequences.

Key findings

  • Across OECD countries, the total fertility rate fell from 3.29 children per woman in 1960 to 1.63 in 2019; all countries in Table 1 experienced declines, and except Israel (TFR 3.22 in 2019), 2019 TFRs were below the replacement rate of 2.1. The Republic of Korea had the lowest 2019 TFR at 0.91 and the largest secular decline at −5.04.
  • Fertility decline is attributed to multiple determinants: rising opportunity costs of childrearing, especially women’s earnings; quantity-quality trade-offs; family policies; uncertainty and old-age security motives; social norms; childlessness; internet and partnership changes; and post-Great Recession/COVID-19 dynamics.
  • Macroeconomic concerns include labor shortages, pressure on pay-as-you-go welfare systems, reduced innovation and entrepreneurship, lower consumption growth, and regional imbalances; compensatory mechanisms include demographic dividends, increased female employment, savings responses, human capital investment, and labor-saving technology.
  • The proposed semi-endogenous growth model with human capital and endogenous education/fertility choice yields Result 1: aggregate human capital growth decreases when fertility increases (and vice versa), and Result 2: a negative effect of population growth on economic growth. Policy implications stress that no single policy is a panacea; immigration, family-friendly policies, education and health investment, R&D, later retirement, and policy synergies are needed.

Methods

  • Design: literature review plus a simple theoretical extension of a semi-endogenous growth model with human capital and endogenous fertility and education choices.
  • Data/sample: OECD country total fertility rates for 1960, 2019, and 2021 from United Nations (2022) and World Bank (2023), presented in Table 1; narrative synthesis of cited empirical and theoretical literature.
  • Main analysis: descriptive comparison of TFR trends; review of determinants and macroeconomic consequences; derivation of model results linking fertility, human capital growth, and long-run economic growth.

Limitations

  • The paper states that its model deliberately switches off the reverse channel from income to fertility and focuses on the economic consequences of changing fertility choices; it captures mainly the quantity-quality trade-off as a long-run compensation mechanism, and many extensions are possible.
  • The paper notes unresolved evidence in the literature, including that the extent of male sperm-count effects remains unresolved, evidence on climate anxiety and voluntary childlessness is inconclusive, and the extent to which human capital improvements offset population aging or decline is unclear.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it does not provide new empirical estimates; its quantitative claims rely on cited studies and a simple theoretical model rather than original causal identification.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-economics-081523-013750

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

45 of 145 cited sources checked · 24 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Falling fertility is the main driver of population aging, with a stronger influence than increasing life expectancy and changing migration patterns.

    “falling fertility as such is the main driver of population aging, with a stronger influence than increasing life expectancy and changing migration patterns (see, e.g., Weil 1997, Bloom & Luca 2016, Prettner & Bloom 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Weil 1997 source
    • cites Bloom & Luca 2016 source
    • cites Prettner & Bloom 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 8

    The ongoing postponement of childbearing to ages at which fecundity declines naturally leads to a further increase in childlessness.

    “At the same time, the ongoing postponement of childbearing to ages at which fecundity declines naturally leads to a further increase in childlessness (Beaujouan 2020, Hwang 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beaujouan 2020 source
    • cites Hwang 2023 source

      The Cohort Trends in Marriage and Fertility section reports that South Korean women delayed childbirth into their 30s while childlessness rose. It does not establish that age-related declines in fecundity caused the increase in childlessness; the Discussion also considers costs and changing values. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 8

    Climate-related extreme weather events tend to depress fertility.

    “While findings indicate that climate-related extreme weather events tend to depress fertility (Sellers & Gray 2019)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sellers & Gray 2019 source

      The Results and Discussion report lower fertility intentions after sustained high temperatures and fewer births among farm households after delayed monsoon onset. But the Discussion also reports increased fertility intentions after monsoon delays in other groups and little effect from short-term temperature shocks. The paper therefore supports some fertility-depressing effects, not a general tendency across climate-related extreme weather events; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2.4. Uncertainty, Insurance, and Intergenerational Transfers · p. 6

    The risk of losing children during infancy induces precautionary fertility.

    “The risk of losing children during infancy has been shown to induce precautionary fertility (e.g., Kalemli-Ozcan 2003, Doepke 2005, Fioroni 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kalemli-Ozcan 2003 source
    • cites Doepke 2005 source
    • cites Fioroni 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation
    § 2.5. Social Norms · p. 8

    There is a U-shaped relationship between norms toward gender equality and fertility.

    “which is in line with the findings of Arpino et al. (2015), who report a U-shaped relationship between norms toward gender equality and fertility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arpino et al. 2015 source
  • May combine two claims. 51
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3. Women's Opportunities, Technology, and Family Policies · p. 6

    The weakening of the trade-off between female employment and childbearing can be attributed to five causes: increasingly effective family policies, technological enhancements, fathers assuming a stronger role in childcare, more agreement on fertility choices within couple bargaining, and changes in social norms.

    “This tendency can essentially be attributed to five causes: ( a ) increasingly effective family policies (for a survey, see Olivetti & Petrongolo 2017), in particular in the areas of public childcare (Bauernschuster et al. 2016, d'Albis et al. 2017), family leave (Lalive &Zweimüller 2009, Raute 2019), taxation (Bick & Fuchs-Schündeln 2018), and benefit schemes (Riphahn & Wiynck 201”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Olivetti & Petrongolo 2017 source
    • cites Bauernschuster et al. 2016 source
    • cites Goldin & Katz 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3. Women's Opportunities, Technology, and Family Policies · p. 6

    Fertility is delayed but whether or not it can be recuperated depends on the socioeconomic and policy context.

    “Here, fertility is delayed but whether or not it can be recuperated depends on the socioeconomic and policy context (see, e.g., Sobotka 2004, Beaujouan 2020, Hwang 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sobotka 2004 source
    • cites Beaujouan 2020 source

      The Discussion and research avenues section (page unavailable) says fertility postponement arises from changing economic conditions and that people who wish to have children need support. The paper also describes cross-country differences in late births and ART laws, but it does not establish that socioeconomic and policy context determines whether postponed fertility is recuperated. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hwang 2023 source

      The Cohort Trends in Marriage and Fertility section reports that South Korean women delayed childbirth and that later births did not fully make up for the decline among the 1970s cohorts. The discussion identifies socioeconomic and policy conditions as possible explanations, but says causal effects are outside the study’s scope. It therefore supports the claim’s broad idea, not a definite finding that those conditions determine whether delayed fertility is recuperated. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4. Uncertainty, Insurance, and Intergenerational Transfers · p. 7

    Differences in exposure to globalization across industries imply a fertility decline among individuals working in industries that are negatively affected and a fertility increase among those working in industries that are expected to benefit.

    “Related research finds that differences in exposure to globalization across industries imply a fertility decline among individuals working in industries that are negatively affected and a fertility increase among those working in industries that are expected to benefit (Autor et al. 2019, Giuntella et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Autor et al. 2019 source

      In section C, the paper reports that trade shocks reduce births among women ages 20–39, while shocks to female-intensive employment raise births. Its analysis concerns local trade exposure and fertility rates, not fertility among individuals working in negatively affected versus benefiting industries; it does not establish the claimed increase for workers in benefiting industries. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Giuntella et al. 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4. Uncertainty, Insurance, and Intergenerational Transfers · p. 7

    The Great Recession strengthened the decline in fertility for most European countries, with the impact most pronounced in Southern and Eastern Europe and muted in Western and especially Northern Europe.

    “Matysiak et al. (2021) find that the Great Recession has strengthened the decline in fertility for most European countries. The impact was most pronounced in Southern and Eastern Europe and muted in Western and, especially, Northern Europe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matysiak et al. 2021 source

      The Abstract reports stronger fertility decline during the recession and a weaker association with recession indicators in Western Europe, especially the Nordic countries. But it locates the strongest declines in Southern Europe, Ireland, and parts of Central and Eastern Europe—not Eastern Europe generally. The Empirical Findings likewise report little or no recession-induced decline in some regions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.5. Social Norms · p. 8

    Norms are contagious across space and persistent across socioeconomic peer groups.

    “Norms have been shown to be both contagious across space (Spolaore & Wacziarg 2022) and persistent across socioeconomic peer groups (e.g., Bauernschuster & Rainer 2012, Chabé-Ferret 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Spolaore & Wacziarg 2022 source
    • cites Bauernschuster & Rainer 2012 source
    • cites Chabé-Ferret 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 8

    Channels through which Internet access affects fertility include greater dissatisfaction with and more versatility in long-term partnerships as well as negative impacts on health that may translate into fertility decline.

    “Channels include greater dissatisfaction with and more versatility in long-term partnerships (T ong et al. 2021) as well as negative impacts on health (Nie et al. 2017, Billari et al. 2018) that may translate into fertility decline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tong et al. 2021 source
    • cites Nie et al. 2017 source

      Section 4.2 (p. 16) reports that more intensive Internet use is associated with slightly higher depression scores, primarily among respondents aged 16–19. This supports a possible negative mental-health association, but not a causal impact on health or a link to fertility decline. The partnership claim is cited to Tong et al., not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Billari et al. 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.4. Consumption and Saving · p. 11

    Demographic developments in high-income countries over the past decades contributed to secular stagnation.

    “Summers (2015) and Eggertsson et al. (2019) argue that the demographic developments in high-income countries over the past decades contributed to secular stagnation, which is how they interpret the sluggish recovery from the global economic and financial crisis of 2008-2009.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Summers 2015 source
    • cites Eggertsson et al. 2019 source

      In “Decline in Interest Rates since 1970” (page unavailable), the paper finds that falling fertility and mortality were major contributors to the decline in US interest rates. Its quantitative model treats the US economy in 2015 as experiencing secular stagnation, with output below its precrisis trend (“Secular Stagnation in a Quantitative Life-Cycle Model,” page unavailable). The analysis is calibrated to the United States, however, so it does not establish the same demographic contribution across high-income countries generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    There is large variation in the fertility transition across developing countries.

    “It should, however, be noted that there is large variation in the fertility transition across developing countries, as emphasized by Bongaarts & Hodgson (2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bongaarts & Hodgson 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    Robotization, as a proxy for the more general digitalization of employment contexts, is associated with lower fertility in European settings.

    “This finding aligns with evidence that robotization, as a proxy for the more general digitalization of employment contexts, is associated with lower fertility in European settings (Matysiak et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matysiak et al. 2023 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) reports a negative association between robot adoption and fertility in certain regions of the six European countries studied. But it also says these effects are offset by fertility increases in better-educated, developing regions. The paper uses robot adoption as a proxy for automation-driven labour-market change, not for digitalization generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.6. Regional Imbalances · p. 11

    Many high-income countries continue to face considerable internal migration, especially from rural to urban areas, leading to a tendency of unbalanced spatial economic development.

    “Many high-income countries continue to face considerable internal migration, especially from rural to urban areas, leading to a tendency of unbalanced spatial economic development (see, e.g., Rosenbaum-Feldbrügge et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rosenbaum-Feldbrügge et al. 2022 source

      Section 5.2 reports substantial internal migration and continued outmigration from rural East Germany, and the Conclusions discuss rural-to-urban migration within East Germany. These passages support Germany as an example, but the paper does not establish a pattern across many high-income countries or show that migration leads to unbalanced spatial economic development; section 5.1 instead discusses economic differences as a driver of migration. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 12

    If demographic dividends are strategically reinvested (e.g., in education, population health, R&D), strong positive knock-on effects on economic growth can be expected, as observed in many East Asian countries.

    “Their findings suggest that if the demographic dividends are strategically reinvested (e.g., in education, population health, R&D, etc.), strong positive knock-on effects on economic growth can be expected (Bloom et al. 2017), as observed in many East Asian countries (Bloom & Finlay 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bloom et al. 2017 source
    • cites Bloom & Finlay 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 13

    The semi-endogenous growth model with human capital and an endogenous education and fertility choice is capable of generating a negative effect of fertility on economic growth and seems more in line with cross-country data.

    “The model is capable of generating a negative effect of fertility on economic growth and, thus, seems to be more in line with cross-country data (see, e.g., Ahituv 2001, Herzer et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ahituv 2001 source
    • cites Herzer et al. 2012 source

      Section 2.2 (page unavailable) reports cross-country evidence of a negative association between fertility and economic growth, and Section 4.1 reports a delayed negative effect of fertility on GDP per capita. This supports the claim that a negative effect is in line with some empirical evidence. The paper does not establish that the citing authors’ semi-endogenous model, with its particular education and fertility choices, generates that effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time t evolves discretely.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The production side of the economy is the same as posited by Jones (1995), except that the knowledge production function features the human capital embodied in the scientific workforce instead of the number of scientists.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Households derive utility from consumption, the number of own children, and the education the children enjoy, with decreasing marginal effects.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A hierarchy of needs holds according to which households prioritize first consumption, then procreation, and finally education, ensured if 1 > α > η > 0.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The costs of children are modeled as forgone parental labor income due to time spent on childcare, and each child requires ψ units of parental time.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Education expenditures of parents are used to pay teachers who educate the children and thereby translate parental education expenditures into children's human capital.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The human capital of children increases with the education resources per child.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3. Savings Response · p. 12

    The fertility decline in China explains about 50% of the increase in aggregate savings, a finding that must be corrected downward when taking into account general equilibrium feedbacks.

    “Curtis et al. (2015) employ structural modeling in partial equilibrium to show that the fertility decline in China explains about 50% of the increase in aggregate savings, a finding that must be corrected downward when taking into account general equilibrium feedbacks (Banerjee et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Curtis et al. 2015 source

      Section 3 (p. 7) describes a partial-equilibrium model, and the Conclusion (p. 14) says reduced family size is a primary driver of China's high household saving rate. But the cited paper does not quantify fertility decline as explaining about 50% of the increase; it also identifies the large working-age population as a driver. The general-equilibrium qualification is attributed to Banerjee et al. in the citing sentence, not to Curtis et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Banerjee et al. 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Human Capital · p. 13

    Human capital investments only partially offset reductions in fertility, implying a decline in the aggregate human capital (or effective labor force) of many countries, an effect that is even more pronounced for countries facing population decline.

    “Siskova et al. (2023) find that human capital investments only partially offset reductions in fertility, implying a decline in the aggregate human capital (or effective labor force) of many countries, an effect that is even more pronounced for countries facing population decline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Siskova et al. 2023 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 15

    A gendered version of the model generates a positive impact on fertility of male earnings but a negative impact of female earnings if women spend more time on childcare and less on formal labor supply than men.

    “A version of such a model that distinguishes the time allocation between women and men in terms of time spent on childcare and time spent on formal labor generates plausible effects of earnings increases that are in line with the discussion in Section 2.1. If women spend more time on childcare and less time on formal labor supply than men (as has been the case historically and still is the case in”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bloom et al. 2020 source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time t evolves discretely.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The production side of the economy is the same as posited by Jones (1995), except that the knowledge production function features the human capital embodied in the scientific workforce instead of the number of scientists.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Households derive utility from consumption, the number of own children, and the education the children enjoy, with decreasing marginal effects.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A hierarchy of needs holds according to which households prioritize first consumption, then procreation, and finally education, ensured if 1 > α > η > 0.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The costs of children are modeled as forgone parental labor income due to time spent on childcare, and each child requires ψ units of parental time.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Abstract · p. 1

    In most high-income countries, the total fertility rate is now below the level that implies a stable population in the long run.

    “In most of these countries, the total fertility rate is now below the level that implies a stable population in the long run.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 16

    In the medium run, a positive effect of falling fertility on parental labor force participation occurs through the term (1 -ψ nt ), which has a growth effect on per capita GDP in the medium run and translates into a positive effect of falling fertility on income in the long run.

    “In the medium run, however, a positive effect of falling fertility on parental labor force participation occurs through the term (1 -ψ nt ). This has a growth effect on per capita GDP in the medium run, which translates into a positive effect of falling fertility on income in the long run.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time t evolves discretely.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The production side of the economy is the same as posited by Jones (1995), except that the knowledge production function features the human capital embodied in the scientific workforce instead of the number of scientists.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Households derive utility from consumption, the number of own children, and the education the children enjoy, with decreasing marginal effects.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A hierarchy of needs holds according to which households prioritize first consumption, then procreation, and finally education, ensured if 1 > α > η > 0.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The costs of children are modeled as forgone parental labor income due to time spent on childcare, and each child requires ψ units of parental time.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Education expenditures of parents are used to pay teachers who educate the children and thereby translate parental education expenditures into children's human capital.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The human capital of children increases with the education resources per child.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Rising Income · p. 4

    During industrialization and throughout the first part of the twentieth century, the Malthusian view was no longer borne out by the data, which instead presented a negative relationship between TFR and GDP.

    “During industrialization and throughout the first part of the twentieth century, the Malthusian view was no longer borne out by the data, which instead presented a negative relationship between TFR and GDP,as is well documented by Doepke et al. (2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doepke et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    When fertility falls, the ratio of dependents starts to shrink initially because of fewer children, opening a time window to reap the benefits of a demographic dividend.

    “when fertility falls, the ratio of dependents starts to shrink initially because of fewer children, opening a time window to reap the benefits of a demographic dividend”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Absent migration, a fertility rate below the replacement level implies a shrinking population and a shrinking workforce in the long run.

    “Absent migration, a fertility rate below the replacement level implies a shrinking population and a shrinking workforce in the long run.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    When fertility falls, families tend to invest more in the education of each child because more resources are available if they need to care for fewer children, implying higher productivity among these children when they enter the labor market.

    “families tend to invest more in the education of each child because more resources are available if they need to care for fewer children. This, in turn, implies higher productivity among these children when they enter the labor market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Low fertility has already led to a slowdown of workforce growth and even implies a decline in the absolute size of the workforce in many high-income countries.

    “Lower fertility has already led to a slowdown of workforce growth and even implies a decline in the absolute size of the workforce in many highincome countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    When fertility falls, labor force participation (particularly of women) tends to rise, leading to an immediate increase of the labor force.

    “labor force participation (particularly of women) tends to rise, which leads to an immediate increase of the labor force”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4. Uncertainty, Insurance, and Intergenerational Transfers · p. 7

    The majority of studies show that the life-cycle income effect tends to dominate, implying that deteriorating employment conditions lead to reductions in fertility.

    “The majority of studies show that the life-cycle income effect tends to dominate, implying that deteriorating employment conditions lead to reductions in fertility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 2.4. Uncertainty, Insurance, and Intergenerational Transfers · p. 6

    Medical improvements and generally better living conditions during the early parts of the twentieth century have curbed both child mortality and precautionary fertility.

    “Medical improvements and generally better living conditions during the early parts of the twentieth century have curbed both child mortality and precautionary fertility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.5. Social Norms · p. 8

    Global fertility decline is particularly well explained by the impact of policy change on social norms.

    “They find that global fertility decline is particularly well explained by the impact of policy change on social norms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Silva & T enreyro 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.1. Rising Income · p. 5

    An increase in female earnings compounds the income effect with a substitution effect, and the substitution effect may dominate.

    “an increase in female earnings compounds the income effect with a substitution effect in the sense that female earnings raise the opportunity cost of having children, and the latter effect may, indeed, dominate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 12

    A second demographic dividend becomes available to the extent that individuals, or the state on their behalf, increase savings to finance old-age support when fewer children or workers are available.

    “In addition, as Mason & Lee (2006) argue, a second demographic dividend becomes available to the extent that individuals, or the state on their behalf, increase savings to finance old-age support when fewer children or workers, more generally, are available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mason & Lee 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2. Sustainability of Welfare Systems · p. 10

    Fertility decline generates fiscal pressure that may lead to increases in taxes and social security contributions or to funding cuts on growth-promoting policies, with both channels compromising economic growth.

    “Hence, fertility decline generates fiscal pressure that may lead to increases in taxes and social security contributions or to funding cuts on growth-promoting policies, with both channels compromising economic growth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Many countries have to support their pay-as-you-go pension or healthcare systems with a substantial part of their tax revenues.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.3. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Technological Progress · p. 10

    A decline in population growth or depopulation has an underappreciated negative effect on innovation.

    “Some economists have expressed concerns that a decline in population growth or even depopulation has an underappreciated negative effect on innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    Some evidence points to a flattening or reversal of the originally negative correlation between GDP and fertility at the macro level, especially in contexts where social change, policies, or high income allow reconciliation between female employment and childbearing, but these developments do not universally translate into a reversal of declining fertility at the aggregate level.

    “While some evidence points to a flattening or reversal of the (originally negative) correlation between GDP and fertility at the macro level (Doepke et al. 2023)-especially in contexts in which social change, policies, or a high income level allow for a reconciliation between female employment and childbearing-these developments do not universally translate into a reversal of declining fertility”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doepke et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    The decline in fertility associated with social and technological change enables a take-off toward sustained economic growth, while complementarities across these processes may drive secular fertility decline as economic development proceeds.

    “While the decline in fertility associated with these processes of social and technological change enables a take-off toward sustained economic growth, complementarities across these processes may drive secular fertility decline as economic development proceeds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3.1. Labor Supply · p. 10

    Upward pressures on wages emerge from demographic change, which cause upward pressures on prices such that inflationary spirals may be induced.

    “In addition, upward pressures on wages emerge, which, in turn, cause upward pressures on prices such that inflationary spirals may be induced by demographic change (see, e.g., Lindh & Malmberg 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lindh & Malmberg 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2. Female Employment · p. 12

    This increase in female labor force participation boosts employment further as compared with a situation with a high fertility rate, particularly in the short and medium run, but the growth effect tends to level off over time because it is a one-time shift.

    “This boosts employment further as compared with a situation with a high fertility rate. This effect is particularly strong in the short and medium run, but the growth effect tends to level off over time, because it is a one-time shift.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.4. Consumption and Saving · p. 11

    A reduction in local demand may inhibit an economy's innovation efforts.

    “By pointing out the role of market size for research and development (R&D), Desmet & Parente (2010) hint at a channel through which a reduction in local demand may inhibit an economy's innovation efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Desmet & Parente 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.5. Fertility Decline and Socioeconomic Inequality · p. 11

    Higher fertility among the socioeconomically disadvantaged may exacerbate inequality and dilute average human capital.

    “Generally, the concern is that higher fertility among the socioeconomically disadvantaged may exacerbate inequality (e.g., Daruich & Kozlowski 2020) and dilute average human capital (Vogl 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Daruich & Kozlowski 2020 source
    • cites Vogl 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 11

    The gradual aging and retirement of workers translate into a subsequent decline of the support ratio, implying that the boost to per capita GDP from the demographic dividend is not permanent.

    “The gradual aging and retirement of workers translate into a subsequent decline of the support ratio, implying that the boost to per capita GDP is not permanent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1. Labor Supply · p. 10

    A fertility decline that is unaccompanied by increases in immigration or a decline in mortality leads to a reduction of population growth and, with a delay, a slowdown in the growth of the labor force.

    “First, a fertility decline that is unaccompanied by increases in immigration or a decline in mortality leads to a reduction of population growth and-with a certain delay to allow for schooling and training-to a slowdown in the growth of the labor force.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    An understanding of how the income-fertility nexus is emerging may be more conducive to understanding cross- and within-country fertility differences than to understanding the secular decline in fertility.

    “Thus, as Doepke et al. (2023) point out, an understanding of how the income-fertility nexus is emerging may be more conducive to understanding cross- and within-country fertility differences than to understanding the secular decline in fertility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doepke et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 12

    These savings would either boost investment in the domestic capital stock or generate claims on foreign production, for example, in countries with higher fertility.

    “These savings would either boost investment in the domestic capital stock or generate claims on foreign production, for example, in countries with higher fertility (Krueger & Ludwig 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Krueger & Ludwig 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    US fertility has not recovered from the bust during the Great Recession, and this is empirically attributed to continued structural change to the economy.

    “Seltzer (2019b) finds that US fertility has not recovered from the bust during the Great Recession and attributes this empirically to continued structural change to the economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seltzer 2019b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 11

    When fertility rates fall, the immediate effect is that the ratio of young dependent individuals to the working-age population starts to decrease, opening a window for a demographic dividend whereby the support ratio increases, allowing an increase in per capita GDP.

    “When fertility rates fall, the immediate effect is that the ratio of young dependent individuals to the working-age population starts to decrease. This opens the window for a demographic dividend (Bloom & Williamson 1998, Bloom et al. 2003), whereby, for a certain duration, the support ratio increases, which allows for an increase in per capita GDP .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bloom & Williamson 1998 source
    • cites Bloom et al. 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    Reductions in child mortality, greater female labor market opportunities, improvements in women's education and health, and changes in social norms toward birth control and female empowerment tend to promote the transition to low-fertility settings.

    “Other channels that tend to promote the transition to low-fertility settings are reductions in child mortality, greater female labor market opportunities, improvements in women's education and health, and changes in social norms toward birth control and female empowerment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1. Labor Supply · p. 10

    Labor shortages have the potential to induce problems in the production of goods, supply chain disruptions, and shortages of goods.

    “This has the potential to induce problems in the production of goods, supply chain disruptions, and even shortages of goods, as many countries experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and in its immediate aftermath.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3.4. Consumption and Saving · p. 11

    A reduction in birth rate implies deflationary tendencies, a reduction in investment by firms, and downward pressure on the equilibrium interest rate.

    “This, in turn, implies deflationary tendencies; a reduction in investment by firms; and, consequently, downward pressure on the equilibrium interest rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.6. Emerging Trends · p. 9

    During the economic-demographic transition, the quantity-quality trade-off plays a crucial role because with technological progress, parental investment in the education of children becomes ever more desirable as fertility falls.

    “During this transition, the quantity-quality trade-off plays a crucial role because with technological progress, parental investment in the education of children becomes ever more desirable as fertility falls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Technological Progress · p. 10

    As the number of working-age individuals decreases, the number of scientists decreases in the long run, which has negative effects on innovation and innovation-driven long-run economic growth in many prominent economic growth models.

    “As the number of working-age individuals decreases, so does the number of scientists in the long run (in the short run, a larger share of the population could become scientists and therefore compensate for the overall population decline). The reduction in the number of scientists, in turn, has negative effects on innovation and, thus, innovation-driven long-run economic growth in many prominent”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Romer 1990 source
    • cites Jones 1995, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Aksoy et al. 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Technological Progress · p. 10

    An increase in the median age of the population decreases new business formation, and older societies tend to exhibit a smaller fraction of entrepreneurs at every age.

    “In addition, Liang et al. (2018) show that an increase in the median age of the population decreases new business formation and that older societies tend to exhibit a smaller fraction of entrepreneurs at every age.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liang et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. Demographic Dividends · p. 11

    A more permanent demographic dividend can be reaped if the additional resources that become available during the demographic window of opportunity are invested in growth-promoting activities.

    “This notwithstanding, a more permanent dividend can be reaped if the additional resources that become available during the demographic window of opportunity are invested in growth-promoting activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3. Savings Response · p. 12

    The savings response to fertility decline should at least partially offset the reduction in labor supply, but this depends on the policy context.

    “While these findings generally support the notion that the savings response to fertility decline should at least partially offset the reduction in labor supply, Sánchez-Romero et al. (2013) show that this also depends on the policy context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sánchez-Romero et al. 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 14

    Jones (2022) shows that the consequences of entrenched below-replacement fertility are long-run depopulation and economic stagnation.

    “Jones (2022) goes one step further and shows that the consequences of entrenched below-replacement fertility are long-run depopulation and economic stagnation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jones 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 17

    A better-educated workforce is more productive, which would increase output and income, and more versatile, which would be helpful in finding new jobs after crises or after older jobs have been made obsolete by technological change.

    “In addition, a better-educated workforce is more productive, which would increase output and income, and more versatile, which would be helpful in finding new jobs after crises or after older jobs have been made obsolete by technological change (see Prettner & Bloom 2020, chapter 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prettner & Bloom 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 18

    An unhealthy population may just not be capable of postponing retirement.

    “An unhealthy population may just not be capable of postponing retirement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Human Capital · p. 13

    Better-educated children are more productive when they enter the labor market, which has a positive effect on economic growth.

    “Better-educated children are more productive when they enter the labor market, which has a positive effect on economic growth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 18

    Immigration can mitigate some of the demographic effects of low fertility.

    “while immigration can mitigate some of the demographic effects of low fertility”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.3. Savings Response · p. 12

    Access to capital markets for old-age savings may depress fertility.

    “As discussed in Section 2.4, access to capital markets for old-age savings may depress fertility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3. Savings Response · p. 12

    The boom-bust sequence in Spain may well have depleted capital, both because of the negative saving incentive of public pensions for the boom cohort and because of the subsequent reliance of the bust cohort on generous bequests.

    “Studying the impacts of the baby boom and baby bust in Spain, accounting for the concomitant expansion of the public pensions system, and allowing for bequests, they find that the boom-bust sequence may well have depleted capital, both because of the negative saving incentive of public pensions for the boom cohort and because of the subsequent reliance of the bust cohort on generous bequests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sánchez-Romero et al. 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Human Capital · p. 13

    There is strong cross-country heterogeneity in the extent to which educational expansion compensates for the decline in the working-age population, and for many countries, population aging will have negative consequences in the foreseeable future.

    “Kotschy & Sunde (2018) identify strong cross-country heterogeneity in the extent to which educational expansion compensates for the decline in the working-age population and find that for many countries, population aging will have negative consequences in the foreseeable future.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kotschy & Sunde 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 14

    It is not the sheer number of people that matters for knowledge creation but rather the presence of well-educated scientists, so the human capital of scientists should feature in the knowledge production function as the main determinant of technological progress and economic growth.

    “However, in general, it is not the sheer number of people that matters for knowledge creation but rather the presence of well-educated scientists who often have decades of training in the fields in which they work. Thus, the human capital of scientists is what should feature in the knowledge production function as the main determinant of technological progress and economic growth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. A SIMPLE MODEL TO RECONCILE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS · p. 14

    In Jones's (1995) work, long-run economic growth is determined by technological progress generated in a knowledge production sector.

    “In Jones's (1995) work, long-run economic growth is determined by technological progress that is generated in a knowledge production sector.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jones 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3. Savings Response · p. 12

    The correlation between demographic factors and domestic savings holds in Southeast Asia but not in Latin America.

    “Similarly, Cavallo et al. (2018) find in a comparative analysis that the correlation between demographic factors and domestic savings holds in Southeast Asia but not in Latin America.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cavallo et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.4. Human Capital · p. 13

    A shrinking cohort of children means that a given government education budget is distributed among fewer pupils, raising the resource intensity of schooling for each child and having the potential to raise economic growth.

    “Moreover, the described behavioral effect is reinforced by an accounting effect in the education sector. A shrinking cohort of children means that a given government education budget is distributed among fewer pupils. This raises the resource intensity of schooling for each child and has the potential to raise economic growth (Prettner 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prettner 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 17

    If fertility rates rise after family-friendly policies are enacted, the number of dependents compared with the working-age population will initially increase, leading to a reverse demographic dividend in the short to medium run, and the positive effects of increasing fertility on workforce and economic growth will only start to materialize after roughly two decades.

    “In this context, it is important to note that if fertility rates rise after such policies are enacted, the number of dependents as compared with the working-age population will initially increase. This would lead to a reverse demographic dividend in the short to medium run, and the positive effects of increasing fertility on workforce and economic growth will only start to materialize after”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 18

    Investments in education and investments in science and technology would be complementary in raising the productivity of workers.

    “investments in education and investments in science and technology would be complementary in raising the productivity of workers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7. CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The steady decrease in fertility rates across high-income countries in recent decades has led to population aging and, in some countries, even to population decline and a shrinking workforce.

    “The steady decrease in fertility rates across high-income countries in recent decades has led to population aging and, in some countries, even to population decline and a shrinking workforce.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 18

    Combining migration, family, and education policies could reduce the extent of population decline.

    “Combining migration, family, and education policies could reduce the extent of population decline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. DISCUSSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS · p. 18

    Policies aimed at achieving a more desirable balance between family and work responsibilities could help to increase fertility and raise labor force participation.

    “Policies aimed at achieving a more desirable balance between family and work responsibilities could help to increase fertility and raise labor force participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
67 of 67
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Increases in tuition and in the rental prices of living spaces have reduced the ability of many families to bring up children in conditions that guarantee them a good childhood.

    “Increases in tuition and in the rental prices of living spaces have reduced the ability of many families to bring up children in conditions that guarantee them a good childhood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Changing social norms related to different dating habits, higher marriage ages, and smaller families have contributed to the decline in fertility.

    “Changing social norms related to different dating habits, higher marriage ages, and smaller families may all have contributed to the decline in fertility.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reductions in biological fecundity and in male sperm count are a plausible reason for low fertility.

    “reductions in biological fecundity and, in particular, in male sperm count that have been observed over recent years are another plausible reason for low fertility”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The advent of social media and dating platforms has changed the matching market as well as fertility choices and opportunities.

    “however, the advent of social media and dating platforms has also changed the matching market as well as fertility choices and opportunities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many countries have to support their pay-as-you-go pension or healthcare systems with a substantial part of their tax revenues.

    “As a consequence, many countries have to support their pay-as-you-go pension or healthcare systems with a substantial part of their tax revenues.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Time t evolves discretely.

    “We assume that time t evolves discretely because including a realistic human capital accumulation process in the model is then straightforward.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The production side of the economy is the same as posited by Jones (1995), except that the knowledge production function features the human capital embodied in the scientific workforce instead of the number of scientists.

    “In so doing, we assume that the production side of the economy is the same as posited by Jones (1995), except that the knowledge production function features the human capital embodied in the scientific workforce instead of the number of scientists.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Households derive utility from consumption, the number of own children, and the education the children enjoy, with decreasing marginal effects.

    “On the consumption side, households derive utility from consumption ( c t ), from the number of own children ( nt ), and from the education the children enjoy ( e t ), reflecting intergenerational altruism. Utility is increasing in all of these arguments but with a decreasing marginal effect.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A hierarchy of needs holds according to which households prioritize first consumption, then procreation, and finally education, ensured if 1 > α > η > 0.

    “For meaningful results, a hierarchy of needs has to hold according to which households prioritize first consumption, then procreation, and finally education. This is ensured if 1 >α > η > 0.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The costs of children are modeled as forgone parental labor income due to time spent on childcare, and each child requires ψ units of parental time.

    “The wage rate is denoted by w t , and the costs of children are modeled as forgone parental labor income due to the time spent on childcare. Assuming that each child requires ψ units of parental time, normalizing parental time endowment to 1, and denoting the price of education by ξ , we have the following household budget constraint:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Education expenditures of parents are used to pay teachers who educate the children and thereby translate parental education expenditures into children's human capital.

    “Next, we assume that the education expenditures of parents are used to pay teachers who educate the children and thereby translate parental education expenditures into children's human capital.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The human capital of children increases with the education resources per child.

    “Assuming that the human capital of children increases with the education resources per child, and denoting the productivity of teachers by κ , we get the following law of motion for individual human capital:”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Demographic cycles are out of phase across countries.

    “It takes advantage of the fact that demographic cycles are out of phase across countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Life expectancy has increased in all rich countries in the past decades.

    “Because life expectancy has increased in all rich countries in the past decades”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People spend more and more time in retirement.

    “people spend more and more time in retirement”
15 of 15

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • US fertility change has the wrong sign

    Major

    The US total fertility rate fell from 3.55 in 1960 to 1.69 in 2019, a change of −1.86. The table reports +1.86, contradicting its stated secular decline.

    Reported 1.86 · recomputed -1.86

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 1960, An economic analysis of fertility, 209
  2. 2003, The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change
  3. 1965, National debt in a neoclassical growth model, Am. Econ. Rev., 55, 1126
  4. 2009, A special report on ageing populations, Economist
  5. 2011a., 70 or bust! Why the retirement age must go up. A special report on pensions, Economist
  6. 2011b, Briefing demography. A tale of three islands, Economist
  7. 2016, Demographic change, human capital accumulation and R&D-based growth, Can. Econ. Rev., 59, 707
  8. 2023, Public R&D, private R&D and growth: a Schumpeterian approach
  9. 2023, Medical progress, aging, and sustainability of health care finance, 61
  10. 1798, An Essay on the Principle of Population
  11. 2020, Automation and Its Macroeconomic Consequences: Theory, Evidence, and Social Impacts
  12. 2023, Social security reforms in heterogeneous aging populations, 199
  13. 2022, Decline and Prosper! Changing Global Birth Rates and the Advantages of Fewer Children
  14. 2022, Long-run economic growth despite population decline
  15. 2022, World population prospects 2022
  16. 2023, World Development Indicators 1960–2023
  17. 2004, Living happily ever after: the economic implications of aging societies

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • 3Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital, Vienna, Austria
  • Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
Venue
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2024-08-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
159-184
ISSN
  • 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1391
OpenAlex
W4394930276
Cited by
42
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • WU Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
low fertility, fertility decline, high-income countries, population decline, fertility determinants, long-run economic impact, fertility policy, population stabilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review