Cited by 49Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Automated visual classification of frequent defects in flat steel coils

Medina, Roberto, Gayubo, Fernando, González-Rodrigo, Luis M., Olmedo, David, Gómez-García-Bermejo, Jaime, Zalama, Eduardo, Perán, José R.·2011·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-011-3352-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Gabor filter has optimal joint localization in both the spatial and spatial-frequency domains.

    “the GF has optimal joint localization in both the spatial and spatial-frequency domains [62].”
  • Gabor filters have difficulty determining the optimal filter parameters and are not robust to rotation invariance.

    “Difficulty in determining the optimal filter parameters and not robust to rotation invariance.”
  • AVI systems relying on multi-classifiers can achieve better classification performance and robustness than those based on individual classifiers.

    “AVI systems relying on multi-classifiers can achieve better classification performance and robustness than those based on individual classifiers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medina, R., Gayubo, F., González-Rodrigo, L. M., Olmedo, D., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., Zalama, E., & Perán, J. R.
Affiliations
  • CARTIF (ES)
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Medina, Roberto
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
57
Issue
9-12
Pages
1087-1097
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W2027528832
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
automated visual inspection, surface defect detection, defect classification, feature extraction, weld defects, white rust, pitting corrosion, steel quality control, image acquisition, image processing, steel cutting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review