Cited by 34Advanced machining processes and optimizationEngineering Technology and MethodologiesAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks

Open access
Xu, Jinyang, El Mansori, Mohamed, Chen, Ming, Ren, Fei·2019·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-019-03734-x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the drilling of CFRP, the roundness error values of the holes Re were 810.47% larger on average than the Ti6Al4V alloy.

    “In the drilling of CFRP, the roundness error values of the holes Re were 810.47% larger on average than the Ti6Al4V alloy [6-9, 17, 19, 20, 23, 38].”

    From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction discusses the difficulty of drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks, but gives no roundness-error comparison. Section 3.5 compares surface roughness after orthogonal cutting, a different measure; searches for roundness error and 810.47% found no supporting passage in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Krishnaraj V, Zitoune R, Collombet F (2010) Comprehensive review on drilling of multimaterials stacks. J Mach Form Technol 2(3–4):1–32
  2. Shaw MC (2005) Metal cutting principles. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, J., El Mansori, M., Chen, M., & Ren, F.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Jinyang
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2019-05-10
Volume
103
Issue
9-12
Pages
3831-3851
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W2944722975
Cited by
34
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SAM, the Arts et Métiers ParisTech open access repository (Paris Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705319)
  • Shanghai Pujiang Program (17PJ1403800)
  • Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST2017-060)
  • State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration (MSVZD201704)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
carbon fiber reinforced polymer, titanium alloys, orthogonal cutting, chip formation, cutting sequence, polycrystalline diamond inserts, cutting force, machined surface quality, machinability, aerospace composites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review