Symbiotic human–robot collaborative approach for increased productivity and enhanced safety in the aerospace manufacturing industry
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employee attitudes toward collaborative robots depend on their practical experience, with experts feeling more confident than beginners.
“Nevertheless, employee attitudes depend on their practical experience: it was noticed that experts felt more confident than beginners.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Most employees positively evaluated the implementation of collaborative robots.
“Moreover, assessment of employee opinions showed that most employees positively evaluated the implementation of collaborative robots.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
In aircraft assembly operations, humans and robots could simultaneously work safely in a common area without any physical separation, significantly reducing time and costs compared with manual operations.
“The obtained results showed that humans and robots could simultaneously work safely in a common area without any physical separation, and significantly reduce time and costs compared with manual operations.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pérez, L., Rodríguez-Jiménez, S., Rodríguez, N., Usamentiaga, R., García, D. F., & Wang, L.
- Affiliations
- Fundación IDONIAL (ES)
- Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Pérez, Luis
- Venue
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2019-11-29
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 851-863
- ISSN
- 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3015
- OpenAlex
- W2990030370
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
- Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Keywords
- human-robot collaboration, collaborative robots, aerospace manufacturing, human-robot interaction safety, immersive collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
