The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review on model predictive control: an engineering perspective
Open accessAbstract
Model-based predictive control (MPC) describes a set of advanced control methods, which make use of a process model to predict the future behavior of the controlled system. By solving a—potentially constrained—optimization problem, MPC determines the control law implicitly. This shifts the effort for the design of a controller towards modeling of the to-be-controlled process. Since such models are available in many fields of engineering, the initial hurdle for applying control is deceased with MPC. Its implicit formulation maintains the physical understanding of the system parameters facilitating the tuning of the controller. Model-based predictive control (MPC) can even control systems, which cannot be controlled by conventional feedback controllers. With most of the theory laid out, it is time for a concise summary of it and an application-driven survey. This review article should serve as such. While in the beginnings of MPC, several widely noticed review paper have been published, a comprehensive overview on the latest developments, and on applications, is missing today. This article reviews the current state of the art including theory, historic evolution, and practical considerations to create intuitive understanding. We lay special attention on applications in order to demonstrate what is already possible today. Furthermore, we provide detailed discussion on implantation details in general and strategies to cope with the computational burden—still a major factor in the design of MPC. Besides key methods in the development of MPC, this review points to the future trends emphasizing why they are the next logical steps in MPC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality
Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00214-9 · Cited by 8,736
The chips are down for Moore’s law
Waldrop, M. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/530144a · Cited by 2,397
Afram, A., Janabi-Sharifi, F., Fung, A. S., & Raahemifar, K. (2017) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.012 · Cited by 655
Serale, G., Fiorentini, M., Capozzoli, A., Bernardini, D., & Bemporad, A. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11030631 · Cited by 637
Cited by
Robust MPC with data-driven demand forecasting for frequency regulation with heat pumps
Bünning, F., Warrington, J., Heer, P., Smith, R. S., & Lygeros, J. (2022) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105101 · Cited by 47
Schmidt, A., Lütge, J., Uhl, A., Köster, D., & Strube, J. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13051498 · Cited by 18
Liu, M., Chen, W.-A., Gao, Y., & Hu, Z. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17219497 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwenzer, M., Ay, M., Bergs, T., & Abel, D.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2021-08-11
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 1327-1349
- ISSN
- 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3015
- OpenAlex
- W3189223768
- Cited by
- 1,132
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 53.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on model predictive control: an engineering perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00170-021-07682-3
- The paper
- Schwenzer, M., Ay, M., Bergs, T., & Abel, D. (2021). Review on model predictive control: an engineering perspective. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07682-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.