Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Analysis of Battery and Thermal Energy Storage for Residential Photovoltaic Heat Pump Systems in Building Electrification

Liu, Mingzhe, Chen, Wei-An, Gao, Yuan, Hu, Zehuan·2025·Sustainability

Abstract

Buildings with electrified heat pump systems, onsite photovoltaic (PV) generation, and energy storage offer strong potential for demand flexibility. This study compares two storage configurations, thermal energy storage (TES) and battery energy storage (BESS), to evaluate their impact on cooling performance and cost savings. A Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework was developed to optimize system operations, aiming to minimize costs while maintaining occupant comfort. Results show that both configurations achieve substantial savings relative to a baseline. The TES system reduces daily operating costs by about 50%, while the BESS nearly eliminates them (over 90% reduction) and cuts grid electricity use by more than 65%. The BESS achieves superior performance because it can serve both the controllable heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system and the home’s broader electrical loads, thereby maximizing PV self-consumption. In contrast, the TES primarily influences the thermal load. These findings highlight that the choice between thermal and electrical storage greatly affects system outcomes. While the BESS provides a more comprehensive solution for whole-home energy management by addressing all electrical demands, further techno-economic evaluation is needed to assess the long-term feasibility and trade-offs of each configuration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su17219497

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jia, W., Yang, Z., Liu, M., Fu, Y., and O’Neill, Z. (2023, January 4–8). Model-Based Characterization of Heat Pump—Thermal Energy Storage Systems for Grid-Interactive Services. Proceedings of the ASHRAE Transactions, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  2. Liu, M., Yang, Z., and O’Neill, Z. (2024, January 15–18). Design And Optimization Of The Conventional Heat Pump With Thermal Energy Storage For Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings. Proceedings of the 8th International High Performance Buildings Conference, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  3. Zhang, Y., Liu, M., Yang, Z., Calfa, C., and O’Neill, Z. (2024, January 14–16). Development and Validation of a Water-to-Air Heat Pump Model Using Modelica. Proceedings of the American Modelica Conference 2024, Storrs, CT, USA.
  4. Briggs, 2003, Climate Classification for Building Energy Codes and Standards: Part 2-Zone Definitions, Maps, and Comparisons, Ashrae Trans., 109, 122

Metadata

Authors
Liu, M., Chen, W.-A., Gao, Y., & Hu, Z.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-10-25
Volume
17
Issue
21
Pages
9497
ISSN
2071-1050
Cited by
9
References
35
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Analysis of Battery and Thermal Energy Storage for Residential Photovoltaic Heat Pump Systems in Building Electrification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su17219497
The paper
Liu, M., Chen, W.-A., Gao, Y., & Hu, Z. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Battery and Thermal Energy Storage for Residential Photovoltaic Heat Pump Systems in Building Electrification. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219497

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.