The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Cited by
Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641 · Cited by 6,408
Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model
Brun, J.-F. (2005) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lhi004 · Cited by 404
A correlated random effects approach to the estimation of models with multiple fixed effects
Yang, Y. (2022) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110408 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M.
- Venue
- Empirical Economics
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 571-580
- ISSN
- 0377-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-8921
- OpenAlex
- W2002300292
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s001810200146
- The paper
- Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810200146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
