Cited by 6,408Global trade and economicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

The Log of Gravity

Open access
Silva, J. M. C. Santos, Tenreyro, Silvana·2006·The Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

Although economists have long been aware of Jensen's inequality, many econometric applications have neglected an important implication of it: under heteroskedasticity, the parameters of log-linearized models estimated by OLS lead to biased estimates of the true elasticities. We explain why this problem arises and propose an appropriate estimator. Our criticism of conventional practices and the proposed solution extend to a broad range of applications where log-linearized equations are estimated. We develop the argument using one particular illustration, the gravity equation for trade. We find significant differences between estimates obtained with the proposed estimator and those obtained with the traditional method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest.88.4.641

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PPML is recommended for estimating the log-linearized model.

    “They recommended using PPML for estimating the log-linearized model.”

    From Do Japan’s Free Trade Agreements Increase Its International Trade? (2022) · cites this paper as Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006)

    In the estimation discussion, the paper specifies that PPML uses exports measured in levels, not a log-transformed dependent variable. Its comparison of estimators distinguishes PPML for the multiplicative model from estimators of the log-linearized model. The authors recommend PPML as an alternative to estimating the log-linearized model, not as a way to estimate it. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Poisson regression is less sensitive to bias in the presence of heteroscedasticity than OLS.

    “Firstly, it is less sensitive to bias in the presence of heteroscedasticity (Silva and Tenreyro, 2006).”
  • PPML can estimate gravity in multiplicative form, which does not lead to dropping zero trade flows from gravity estimations.

    “Due to its ability to handle heteroskedasticity in the trade data, which renders OLS estimates inconsistent, and to estimate gravity in multiplicative form, which does not lead to dropping the zero trade flows from gravity estimations, PPML established itself as the leading gravity estimator (Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2022).”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006)

  • PPML can handle heteroskedasticity in trade data, which renders OLS estimates inconsistent.

    “Due to its ability to handle heteroskedasticity in the trade data, which renders OLS estimates inconsistent, and to estimate gravity in multiplicative form, which does not lead to dropping the zero trade flows from gravity estimations, PPML established itself as the leading gravity estimator (Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2022).”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006)

  • The OLS estimates may indeed be biased.

    “Consistent with the main argument from Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006), this suggests the OLS estimates may indeed be biased.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Anderson, J., "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review 69 (1979), 106-116.
  2. Anderson, J., and E. van Wincoop, "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review 93 (2003), 170- 192.
  3. Bergstrand, J., "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence," this RE- VIEW, 69 (1985), 474-481.
  4. Boisso, D., and M. Ferrantino, "Economic and Cultural Distance in International Trade: Empirical Puzzles," Journal of Economic Integration 12 (1997), 456-484.
  5. Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  6. Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon, Estimation and Inference in Econo- metrics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
  7. Davis, D., "Intra-industry Trade: A Hecksher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach," Journal of International Economics 39 (1995), 201-226.
  8. Deardoff, A., "Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?" in Jeffrey Frankel (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  9. Delgado, M., "Semiparametric Generalized Least Squares Estimation in the Multivariate Nonlinear Regression Model," Econometric The- ory 8 (1992), 203-222.
  10. Delgado, M., and T. J. Kniesner, "Count Data Models with Variance of Unknown Form: An Application to a Hedonic Model of Worker Absenteeism," this REVIEW, 79 (1997), 41-49.
  11. Eaton, J., and A. Tamura, "Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and US Trade and Direct Foreign Investment Patterns," Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 8 (1994), 478-510.
  12. Eichengreen, B., and D. Irwin, "Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs, and the Reorientation of World Trade in the 1930's," Journal of Interna- tional Economics, 38 (1995), 1-24.
  13. Eicker, F., "Asymptotic Normality and Consistency of the Least Squares Estimators for Families of Linear Regressions," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34 (1963), 447-456.
  14. Feenstra, R., J. Markusen, and A. Rose, "Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among Alternative Theories of Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics 34 (2001), 430-447.
  15. Frankel, J., and A. Rose, "An Estimate of the Effect of Common Curren- cies on Trade and Income," Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2002), 409-466.
  16. Frankel, J., E. Stein, and S. Wei, "Continental Trading Blocs: Are They Natural, or Super-Natural?" in J. Frankel (Ed.), The Regionaliza- tion of the World Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  17. Goldberger, A. "The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions," Econometrica 36 (1968), 464-472.
  18. Goldberger, A., A Course in Econometrics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
  19. Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, and A. Trognon, "Pseudo Maximum Likeli- hood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models," Econometrica 52 (1984), 701-720.
  20. Hallak, J. C., "Product Quality and the Direction of Trade," Journal of International Economics 68 (2006), 238-265.
  21. Harrigan, J., "OECD Imports and Trade Barriers in 1983," Journal of International Economics 35 (1993), 95-111.
  22. Helpman, E., and P. Krugman, Market Structure and Foreign Trade (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985).
  23. Koenker, R., and G. S. Bassett, Jr., "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica 46 (1978), 33-50.
  24. Manning, W. G., and J. Mullahy, "Estimating Log Models: To Transform or Not to Transform?" Journal of Health Economics 20 (2001), 461-494.
  25. McCallum, J., "National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns," American Economic Review 85 (1995), 615-623.
  26. Papke, L. E., and J. M. Wooldridge, "Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participa- tion Rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (1996), 619-632.
  27. Park, R., "Estimation with Heteroskedastic Error Terms," Econometrica 34 (1966), 888.
  28. Ramsey, J. B., "Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least Squares Regression Analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 31 (1969), 350-371.
  29. Robinson, P. M., "Asymptotically Efficient Estimation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form," Econometrica 55 (1987), 875-891.
  30. Rose, A., "One Money One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade," Economic Policy 15 (2000), 7-46.
  31. White, H., "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica 48 (1980), 817-838.
  32. Winkelmann, R., Econometric Analysis of Count Data, 4th ed. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003).
  33. Windmeijer, F., and J. M. C. Santos Silva, "Endogeneity in Count Data Models: An Application to Demand for Health Care," Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 (1997), 281-294.
  34. Wooldridge, J. M., "Distribution-Free Estimation of Some Nonlinear Panel Data Models," Journal of Econometrics 90 (1999), 77-97. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S.
Affiliations
  • ISEG/Universidade Técnica de Lisboa and CEMAPRE
  • Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB)
Venue
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
641-658
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W2100130392
Cited by
6,408
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 673 · 2025: 555 · 2024: 497 · 2023: 428 · 2022: 433 · 2021: 510 · 2020: 381 · 2019: 294 · 2018: 323 · 2017: 271 · 2016: 311 · 2015: 328 · 2014: 342 · 2013: 249 · 2012: 209
FWCI
175.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
Jensen's inequality, heteroscedasticity, log-linearization, elasticity estimation, OLS bias, gravity model, trade flows, estimator bias correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review