ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame
Open accessAbstract
ITRF2008 is a refined version of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on reprocessed solutions of the four space geodetic techniques: VLBI, SLR, GPS and DORIS, spanning 29, 26, 12.5 and 16 years of observations, respectively. The input data used in its elaboration are time series (weekly from satellite techniques and 24-h session-wise from VLBI) of station positions and daily Earth Orientation Parameters (EOPs). The ITRF2008 origin is defined in such a way that it has zero translations and translation rates with respect to the mean Earth center of mass, averaged by the SLR time series. Its scale is defined by nullifying the scale factor and its rate with respect to the mean of VLBI and SLR long-term solutions as obtained by stacking their respective time series. The scale agreement between these two technique solutions is estimated to be 1.05 ± 0.13 ppb at epoch 2005.0 and 0.049 ± 0.010 ppb/yr. The ITRF2008 orientation (at epoch 2005.0) and its rate are aligned to the ITRF2005 using 179 stations of high geodetic quality. An estimate of the origin components from ITRF2008 to ITRF2005 (both origins are defined by SLR) indicates differences at epoch 2005.0, namely: −0.5, −0.9 and −4.7 mm along X , Y and Z -axis, respectively. The translation rate differences between the two frames are zero for Y and Z , while we observe an X -translation rate of 0.3 mm/yr. The estimated formal errors of these parameters are 0.2 mm and 0.2 mm/yr, respectively. The high level of origin agreement between ITRF2008 and ITRF2005 is an indication of an imprecise ITRF2000 origin that exhibits a Z -translation drift of 1.8 mm/yr with respect to ITRF2005. An evaluation of the ITRF2008 origin accuracy based on the level of its agreement with ITRF2005 is believed to be at the level of 1 cm over the time-span of the SLR observations. Considering the level of scale consistency between VLBI and SLR, the ITRF2008 scale accuracy is evaluated to be at the level of 1.2 ppb (8 mm at the equator) over the common time-span of the observations of both techniques. Although the performance of the ITRF2008 is demonstrated to be higher than ITRF2005, future ITRF improvement resides in improving the consistency between local ties in co-location sites and space geodesy estimates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GNSS station coordinates provided by the IGS or IERS (e.g. ITRF2008) reach vertical accuracies of about 5-10 mm.
“For instance, the station coordinates provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) or the IERS (e.g.ITRF2008) reach vertical accuracies of about 5-10 mm (cf.Altamimi et al. 2011, 2016, or Seitz et al. 2013).”
From Geodetic methods to determine the relativistic redshift at the level of 10 $$^{-18}$$ - 18 in the context of international timescales: a review and practical results (2018) · cites this paper as Altamimi et al. 2011
IGS/IERS station coordinates reach vertical accuracies of about 5-10 mm.
“For instance, the station coordinates provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) or the IERS (e.g. ITRF2008) reach vertical accuracies of about 5-10 mm (cf. [159, 160, 161]).”
From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [159]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Serpelloni, E., Faccenna, C., Spada, G., Dong, D., & Williams, S. D. P. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2013jb010102 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Mehlstäubler, T. E., Grosche, G., Lisdat, C., Schmidt, P. O., & Denker, H. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab409 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Drewes, H., Kuglitsch, F., Adám, J., & Rózsa, S. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Vertical datum unification for the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Sánchez, L., & Sideris, M. G. (2017) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx025 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A conventional value for the geoid reference potential $$W_{0}$$ W 0
Sánchez, L., Čunderlík, R., Dayoub, N., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Šíma, Z., Vatrt, V., & Vojtíšková, M. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Denker, H., Timmen, L., Voigt, C., Weyers, S., Peik, E., Margolis, H. S., Delva, P., Wolf, P., & Petit, G. (2018) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-017-1075-1 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“Ellipsoidal coordinates are given in Table 2 at the epoch 2005.0, the standard reference epoch associated with the ITRF2008 (see Altamimi et al. 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications
Delva, P., Denker, H., & Lion, G. (2019) · Fundamental Theories of Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“pendent of the interstation distance. For instance, the station coordinates provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) or the IERS (e.g. ITRF2008) reach vertical accuracies of about 5{10mm (cf. [159, 160, 161]). The uncertainty of the quasigeoid heights (height anomalies) is discussed in the previous subsection,…”
Method
- Authors
- Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X., & Métivier, L.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de l’information géographique et forestière (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Altamimi, Zuheir
- Venue
- Journal of Geodesy
- Published
- 2011-02-03
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 457-473
- ISSN
- 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1394
- OpenAlex
- W2069295925
- Cited by
- 1,181
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 164 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 189.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Keywords
- International Terrestrial Reference Frame, Earth orientation parameters, very long baseline interferometry, satellite laser ranging, GPS, DORIS, station positions, ITRF2005, ITRF2000, translation rate, geodetic time series
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review