Cited by 98Geophysics and Gravity MeasurementsGNSS positioning and interferenceGeophysics and Sensor Technology

A conventional value for the geoid reference potential $$W_{0}$$ W 0

Sánchez, L., Čunderlík, R., Dayoub, N., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Šíma, Z., Vatrt, V., Vojtíšková, M.·2016·Journal of Geodesy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The International Association of Geodesy released IAG Resolution No.1 for the definition and realization of the International Height Reference System in 2015.

    “To establish a consistent and accurate physical reference frame, the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) released IAG Resolution No.1.for the definition and realization of an International Height Reference System (IHRS) in 2015 [3]”
  • W0 can be determined in principle from satellite altimetry and a global geopotential model.

    “where the latter value can be determined in principle from satellite altimetry and a global geopotential model (see Burša et al. 1999or Sánchez et al. 2016).”
  • No adopted standards exist for the definition of MSL, the handling of time-dependent terms, and the derivation of W0.

    “Although the classical geodetic geoid definition and the IAG 2015 resolution both refer to the worldwide mean ocean surface, so far no adopted standards exist for the definition of MSL, the handling of time-dependent terms (e.g., due to global sea level rise), and the derivation of W 0 , where the latter value can be determined in principle from satellite altimetry and a global geopotential model”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez, L., Čunderlík, R., Dayoub, N., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Šíma, Z., Vatrt, V., & Vojtíšková, M.
Affiliations
  • Latakia University (SY)
  • Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences, Astronomical Institute (CZ)
  • Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Venue
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
90
Issue
9
Pages
815-835
ISSN
  • 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1394
OpenAlex
W2406143736
Cited by
98
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Department of Mathematics and Descriptive Geometry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Department of Topography, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria
  • Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
  • Military Geographic and Hydrometeorologic Office, Dobruška, Czech Republic
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysics and Sensor Technology
Keywords
geoid, mean sea surface, Earth gravity field, gravity field modeling, satellite laser ranging, grace, GOCE, satellite altimetry, omission and commission errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review