The GBVP approach for vertical datum unification: Recent results in North America
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The geodetic boundary value problem method can provide a global solution for height unification, and its precision in well-surveyed regions reaches several centimeters.
“It can provide a global solution for height unification, and the precision in well-surveyed regions reaches several centimeters [9][10][11].”
From Unification of a Global Height System at the Centimeter-Level Using Precise Clock Frequency Signal Links (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Amjadiparvar, B., Rangelova, E., & Sideris, M. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Amjadiparvar, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geodesy
- Published
- 2015-10-05
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-63
- ISSN
- 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1394
- OpenAlex
- W1941421521
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Resources Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
- Keywords
- vertical datum unification, geodetic boundary value problem, North American Vertical Datum of 1988, GNSS leveling, tide gauge, North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
