GEOID99 and G99SSS: 1-arc-minute geoid models for the United States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Successive U.S. national geoid models (GEOID96, GEOID99, GEOID03, and their successors) apply Stokes' approach using large compilations of terrestrial, airborne, and satellite-derived gravity data.
“Successive U.S. national geoid models (GEOID96, GEOID99, GEOID03, and their successors) apply this approach using large compilations of terrestrial, airborne, and satellite-derived gravity data [23, 25].”
From Chapter 1 Theoretical background (1996) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008916 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
Regional Gravity Field Modeling: Theory and Practical Results
Denker, H. (2013) · Sciences of Geodesy - II · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
The US Gravimetric Geoid of 2009 (USGG2009): model development and evaluation
Wang, Y. M., Saleh, J., Li, X., & Roman, D. R. (2012) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0506-7 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationThe relativistic redshift with 3 10<sup> 17</sup>uncertainty at NIST, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Pavlis, N. K., & Weiss, M. A. (2003) · Metrologia · doi:10.1088/0026-1394/40/2/311 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Chapter 1 Theoretical background
(1996) · The Metrical Organization of Beowulf · doi:10.1515/9783110810493.1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, D. A., & Roman, D. R.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- ORCID
- Roman, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geodesy
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 469-490
- ISSN
- 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1394
- OpenAlex
- W1972255152
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
- Keywords
- geoid model, gravimetric geoid, EGM96, gravity data, digital elevation model, satellite altimetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
