Cited by 61Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse

Powers, Kenneth, Lazarou, George, Wang, Andrea, LaCombe, Julie, Bensinger, Giti, Greston, Wilma M., Mikhail, Magdy S.·2006·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review our experience with pessary use for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Charts of patients treated for Stage III and IV prolapse were reviewed. Comparisons were made between patients who tried or refused pessary use. A successful trial of pessary was defined by continued use; a failed trial was defined by a patient's discontinued use. Thirty-two patients tried a pessary; 45 refused. Patients who refused a pessary were younger, had lesser degree of prolapse, and more often had urinary incontinence. Most patients (62.5%) continued pessary use and avoided surgery. Unsuccessful trial of pessary resorting to surgery included four patients (33%) with unwillingness to maintain, three patients (25%) with inability to retain and two patients (17%) with vaginal erosion and/or discharge. Our findings suggest that pessary use is an acceptable first-line option for treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-005-1311-8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, K., Lazarou, G., Wang, A., LaCombe, J., Bensinger, G., Greston, W. M., & Mikhail, M. S.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Powers, Kenneth
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2005-05-10
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
160-164
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2012231337
Cited by
61
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pessary, pelvic organ prolapse, advanced pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, vaginal erosion, surgical avoidance, first-line therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Pessaries, Prolapse, Retrospective Studies, Uterine Prolapse, Visceral Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review