Cited by 12Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsGastrointestinal motility and disordersEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Postoperative bowel function, symptoms, and habits in women after vaginal reconstructive surgery

Open access
Ballard, Alicia, Parker-Autry, Candace, Lin, Chee Paul, Markland, Alayne D., Ellington, David R., Richter, Holly E.·2015·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to characterize postoperative bowel symptoms in women undergoing vaginal prolapse reconstructive surgery randomized to preoperative bowel preparation vs a regular diet.Methods Subjects (N = 121) completed two bowel diaries: a 7-day bowel diary immediately before surgery and a 14-day diary postoperatively. Self-reported bowel diary data and symptoms included the time to first bowel movement (BM), daily number of BMs, Bristol Stool Form Scale score, pain, and urgency associated with BM, episodes of fecal incontinence, and use of laxatives. Antiemetic use was abstracted from medical records. Outcomes of groups were compared using Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test or Student's t test as appropriate.Results Mean time to first postoperative BM was similar in the bowel preparation (n = 60) and control groups (n = 61), 81.2 ± 28.9 vs 78.6 ± 28.2 h, p = 0.85. With the first BM, there were no significant differences between bowel preparation and control groups regarding pain (17.2 vs 27.9 %, p = 0.17), fecal urgency with defecation (56.9 vs 52.5 %, p = 0.63), fecal incontinence (14.0 vs 15.0 %, p = 0.88) and >1 use of laxatives (93.3 vs 96.7 % p = 0.44) respectively. Antiemetic use was similar in both groups (48.3 vs 55.7 % respectively, p = 0.42).Conclusions There were no differences in the return of bowel function and other bowel symptoms postoperatively between the randomized groups. Lack of bowel preparation does not have an impact on the risk of painful defecation postoperatively. This information may be used to inform patients regarding expectations for bowel function after vaginal reconstructive surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-015-2634-8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballard, A., Parker-Autry, C., Lin, C. P., Markland, A. D., Ellington, D. R., & Richter, H. E.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Richter, Holly E.
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
817-821
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W1983905304
Cited by
12
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2K24-DK068389, K24DK068389)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
postoperative bowel function, vaginal reconstruction, vaginal prolapse, bowel preparation, bowel diary, fecal incontinence, defecation pain, fecal urgency, laxative use, antiemetic use, women
MeSH terms
Aged, Cathartics, Defecation, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Preoperative Care, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review