Cited by 36Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Lifestyle advice with or without pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

Due, Ulla, Brostrøm, Søren, Lose, Gunnar·2016·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis We evaluated the effect of adding pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to a structured lifestyle advice program.Methods This was a single-blinded randomized trial of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage ≥ II. Participants were randomized to a structured lifestyle advice program with or without PFMT. Both groups received similar lifestyle advice in six separate group sessions. The combined group performed group PFMT after an individual assessment. Primary outcome was a global improvement scale at six-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the global scale and objective POP at three-month follow-up, symptoms and quality of life including sexuality, at three and six-month follow-up. A clinically relevant change of symptoms was defined as ≥ 15 %.Results We included 109 women. Eighty-nine women (82 %) completed three months follow-up; 85 (78 %) completed six-month follow-up. At both follow-ups, significantly more women in the combined group reported improvement in the global scale. At the three-month follow-up, the combined group only had significant improvement of POP symptoms while only the lifestyle advice group had significant improvement of quality of life. Change in objective POP and sexuality was nonsignificant. The symptom score improved 17 % in the combined group and 14 % in the lifestyle advice group (P = 0.57). Significantly more women in the lifestyle advice group had sought further treatment at the six-month follow-up.Conclusion Adding PFMT to a structured lifestyle advice program gave superior results in a global scale and for POP symptoms. Overall effect of either intervention barely reached clinical relevance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-015-2852-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 36

Authors
Due, U., Brostrøm, S., & Lose, G.
Affiliations
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • National Board of Health (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Due, Ulla
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2015-10-06
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
555-563
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W1886045368
Cited by
36
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Astellas Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle training, lifestyle advice, group exercise intervention, prolapse symptoms, quality of life, sexuality, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method, Pelvic Floor, Sexuality, Directive Counseling, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review