Cited by 41Sexual function and dysfunction studiesPelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Relationship between pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study

de Menezes Franco, Maíra, Driusso, Patricia, Bø, Kari, Carvalho de Abreu, Daniela Cristina, da Silva Lara, Lucia Alves, de Sá Rosa e Silva, Ana Carolina Japur, Ferreira, Cristine Homsi Jorge·2017·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women is high. Theoretically pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength could influence sexual function, but to date there is scant evidence on this topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PFM strength and sexual function in postmenopausal women. The relationship between reported urinary incontinence (UI) and sexual dysfunction was also investigated.Methods This was a cross-sectional study including 113 postmenopausal women. PFM strength was evaluated using vaginal manometry. Sexual function was evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). A score of ≤26.5 was considered to indicate sexual dysfunction. Urinary incontinence reports were evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI) Short Form. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ), the Mann-Whitney test and 95 % confidence intervals.Results The median age of the women was 53 years (range 42 - 65 years) and their median body mass index was 27.9 kg/m 2 (range 20 - 42 kg/m 2). Women without sexual dysfunction showed significantly higher PFM strength (median 41.8, range 11.3 - 94.0 cmH 2 O) than women with sexual dysfunction (median 30.3, range 3 - 112 cmH 2 O; p = 0.02). A weak correlation was found between the total FSFI score and the total ICIQ-UI score (ρ = -0.21, p = 0.03).Conclusions Postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction showed lower PFM strength than women without sexual dysfunction. There was a weak correlation between urinary incontinence severity and sexual function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-016-3211-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Menezes Franco, M., Driusso, P., Bø, K., Carvalho de Abreu, D. C., da Silva Lara, L. A., de Sá Rosa e Silva, A. C. J., & Ferreira, C. H. J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Cristine Homsi Jorge
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2016-12-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
931-936
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2560835229
Cited by
41
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (- 2012/215239)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle strength, sexual dysfunction, postmenopausal women, urinary incontinence, Female Sexual Function Index, female sexual function
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Manometry, Middle Aged, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Urinary Incontinence, Vagina, Postmenopause, Pelvic Floor, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review