The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis Uterosacral ligament (USL) suspension is an effective and versatile surgical technique for repairing pelvic organ prolapse. However, ureteral injury is a feared complication that may act as a significant deterrent to the use of USL suspension. The aim of the video is to provide key steps to minimize the risk of ureteral injury while achieving successful transvaginal USL suspension. Methods The featured video provides a series of surgical tips and tricks that can be applied to protect the ureters while achieving USL suspension whether the procedure contemplated is vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal vault repair after hysterectomy, or hysteropexy. Results The tips and tricks are classified into four categories: identification of the USLs, identification of the ureters, passage of the sutures, and final measures. Conclusions The USL suspension technique requires adequate surgical training and an understanding of pelvic anatomy. This tips and tricks video tutorial may be an important tool for improving surgical know-how, and thus for reducing the risk of ureteral injury. In particular, identification of the USLs and ureters, proper suture positioning and final cystoscopy are key points to minimize ureteral damage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High USL suspension is a valid and effective procedure for central compartment repair.
“Among native‐tissue techniques, high uterosacral ligaments (USL) suspension is considered a valid and effective procedure for central compartment repair.”
From Native-tissue prolapse repair: Efficacy and adverse effects of uterosacral ligaments suspension at 10-year follow up (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1873–6. · DOI
- Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Interdonato ML, Cesana MC, Verri D, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):65–71. · DOI
- Milani R, Frigerio M, Cola A, Beretta C, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Outcomes of transvaginal high uterosacral ligaments suspension: over 500-patient single-center study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000403 . · DOI · Paper page
- Milani R, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, Spelzini F. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):73–6. · DOI · Paper page
- Milani R, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a video tutorial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):789–91. · DOI
- Milani R, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3277-8 . · DOI
- Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1402–10. discussion 1410-1 · DOI
- Gabriel B, Denschlag D, Göbel H, et al. Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):475–9. · DOI
- Rivaux G, Rubod C, Dedet B, et al. Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(1):135–9. · DOI
- Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, et al. Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(6):873–9.
- Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):124–34. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cola, A., Marino, G., Milani, R., Barba, M., Volontè, S., Spelzini, F., Manodoro, S., & Frigerio, M. (2022) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14096 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manodoro, S., Frigerio, M., Milani, R., & Spelzini, F.
- Affiliations
- Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Manodoro, Stefano
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2017-10-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-163
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W2765621170
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Ureteral procedures and complications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Keywords
- uterosacral ligament suspension, ureteral injury, pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal surgery, ureter identification, suture placement, cystoscopy, vaginal hysterectomy, hysteropexy, surgical technique
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Ligaments, Postoperative Complications, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Suture Techniques, Ureter, Vagina, Video Recording, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review