Cited by 27Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUreteral procedures and complicationsUterine Myomas and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury

Manodoro, Stefano, Frigerio, Matteo, Milani, Rodolfo, Spelzini, Federico·2018·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Uterosacral ligament (USL) suspension is an effective and versatile surgical technique for repairing pelvic organ prolapse. However, ureteral injury is a feared complication that may act as a significant deterrent to the use of USL suspension. The aim of the video is to provide key steps to minimize the risk of ureteral injury while achieving successful transvaginal USL suspension. Methods The featured video provides a series of surgical tips and tricks that can be applied to protect the ureters while achieving USL suspension whether the procedure contemplated is vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal vault repair after hysterectomy, or hysteropexy. Results The tips and tricks are classified into four categories: identification of the USLs, identification of the ureters, passage of the sutures, and final measures. Conclusions The USL suspension technique requires adequate surgical training and an understanding of pelvic anatomy. This tips and tricks video tutorial may be an important tool for improving surgical know-how, and thus for reducing the risk of ureteral injury. In particular, identification of the USLs and ureters, proper suture positioning and final cystoscopy are key points to minimize ureteral damage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-017-3497-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1873–6. · DOI
  2. Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Interdonato ML, Cesana MC, Verri D, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):65–71. · DOI
  3. Milani R, Frigerio M, Cola A, Beretta C, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Outcomes of transvaginal high uterosacral ligaments suspension: over 500-patient single-center study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000403 . · DOI · Paper page
  4. Milani R, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, Spelzini F. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):73–6. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Milani R, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a video tutorial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):789–91. · DOI
  6. Milani R, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3277-8 . · DOI
  7. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1402–10. discussion 1410-1 · DOI
  8. Gabriel B, Denschlag D, Göbel H, et al. Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):475–9. · DOI
  9. Rivaux G, Rubod C, Dedet B, et al. Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(1):135–9. · DOI
  10. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, et al. Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(6):873–9.
  11. Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):124–34. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Manodoro, S., Frigerio, M., Milani, R., & Spelzini, F.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
Corresponding author
Manodoro, Stefano
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2017-10-16
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
161-163
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2765621170
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Ureteral procedures and complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
uterosacral ligament suspension, ureteral injury, pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal surgery, ureter identification, suture placement, cystoscopy, vaginal hysterectomy, hysteropexy, surgical technique
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Ligaments, Postoperative Complications, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Suture Techniques, Ureter, Vagina, Video Recording, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review