Cited by 31Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse?

Anglim, Breffini, O’Sullivan, Orfhlaith, O’Reilly, Barry·2018·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Increasingly, uterine preservation surgeries are being performed for treating apical prolapse. Several types of procedures and surgical approaches to correct apical prolapse have been described in the literature. Despite this, there remains inadequate information to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal treatment approach and materials to use, and trials are ongoing to identify the optimal techniques. In the future, our patients may be the strongest determining influence when it comes to choice of apical prolapse surgery, with factors such as autonomy, reproduction, intimacy and fear influencing their decision. It is our opinion that the two most powerful forces behind the choice of apical POP surgical technique are the woman's personal desire for uterine preservation or not and the surgeon's personal choice of procedure based on training received. Present management of apical prolapse involves understanding patient goals and acknowledging their treatment preferences and values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-018-3685-4

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anglim, B., O’Sullivan, O., & O’Reilly, B.
Affiliations
  • Cork University Hospital (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Anglim, Breffini
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1075-1079
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2808382725
Cited by
31
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
apical pelvic organ prolapse, uterine preservation, hysterectomy, patient decision-making, surgeon decision-making, treatment preferences, patient autonomy, reproductive goals, intimate relationships
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterus, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Organ Sparing Treatments, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review