Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis Apical vaginal support for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse can be provided by vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic routes. Sacrocolpopexy is associated with higher satisfaction rates and a lower re-operation rate than vaginal sacrospinous fixation. The laparoscopic approach can reduce hospital stay and blood loss. There are concerns about the use of mesh in urogynaecological procedures, but limited data indicate a low mesh complication rate with sacrocolpopexy (0-5%). This study was aimed at establishing the incidence of complications following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at a large tertiary hospital. Cases were identified from coding data, theatre logs and the national urogynaecology procedure database. Data were gathered from theatre records, patient notes and the national database. Demographic data, concomitant procedures performed, duration of surgery, intra-operative complications, change in pelvic organ prolapse quantification point C, duration of stay, late complications and further urogynaecological surgery were assessed. Results A total of 660 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between 2005 and 2017 (median time from surgery 4 years 3 months). Five cases (0.7%) developed vaginal mesh exposure. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen. Three required surgical excision of the mesh. Four patients (0.6%) presented with erosion of non-absorbable vaginal sutures. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen and oral antibiotics. Two were managed with vaginal suture excision. Conclusions This large series suggests that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy might confer a low risk of mesh exposure. Together with good anatomical and patient-reported outcomes, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe option for patients presenting with post-hysterectomy vault prolapse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A previous retrospective study demonstrated that when the mesh was secured with braided sutures, the occurrence of suture erosion after SCP was as high as 10.82 after adjusting for relevant factors such as age and concomitant procedures.
“A previous retrospective study demonstrated that when the mesh was secured with braided sutures, the occurrence of suture erosion after SCP was as high as 10.82 after adjusting for relevant factors such as age and concomitant procedures [22].”
From Composite Failure Associated With Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy With Supracervical Hysterectomy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy
Thomas, T. N., Davidson, E. R. W., Lampert, E. J., Paraiso, M. F. R., & Ferrando, C. A. (2020) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-020-04291-8 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Alsahabi, J. A., Alsary, S., & Abolfotouh, M. A. (2023) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s413729 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sato, H., Otsuka, S., Sugita, K., Abe, H., & Tsukada, S. (2025) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.25640 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“A previous retrospective study demonstrated that when the mesh was secured with braided sutures, the occurrence of suture erosion after SCP was as high as 10.82 after adjusting for relevant factors such as age and concomitant procedures [22].”
Influential
- Authors
- Baines, G., Price, N., Jefferis, H., Cartwright, R., & Jackson, S. R.
- Affiliations
- King's College Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Baines, Georgina
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2019-04-30
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1475-1481
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W2943055026
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, mesh complications, vaginal mesh exposure, vaginal mesh erosion, suture erosion, mesh excision, pelvic organ prolapse surgery, surgical safety
- MeSH terms
- Colposcopy, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Sacrum, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review