The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Levels of pelvic floor support: what do they look like on magnetic resonance imaging?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uterus removal requires disruption of level 1 and level 2 attachments that provide pelvic floor support, and rebuilding these levels through suspension sutures anchored to the posterior cervix may facilitate better biomechanical performance than severing connective tissue and anchoring the distal remnants to the vaginal cuff.
“Uterus removal requires disruption of level 1 (mesenteric) and level 2 (paravaginal) attachments that provide pelvic floor support 62 ; rebuilding these levels through suspension sutures anchored to the posterior cervix may facilitate better biomechanical performance than severing connective tissue and anchoring the distal remnants to the vaginal cuff.”
From Hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a prospective cohort study (2025) · cites this paper as [62]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anatomie aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy
DeLancey, J. O. L. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o · Cited by 999
Self-citationMagnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey's vaginal support levels I, II, and III
Huddleston, H. T., Dunnihoo, D. R., Huddleston, P. M., & Meyers, P. C. (1995) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)91411-0 · Cited by 93
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brennand, E. A., Scime, N. V., Huang, B., Edwards, A. D., Kim-Fine, S., Hall, J., Birch, C., Robert, M., & Carter Ramirez, A. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.021 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Huebner, M., & DeLancey, J. O. L.
- Affiliations
- Stiftung Lindenhof Bern (CH)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huebner, Markus
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2019-05-29
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1593-1595
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- PMC
- PMC6707880
- OpenAlex
- W2947707587
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD038665, P50HD044406)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- pelvic floor support, pelvic organ prolapse, magnetic resonance imaging, pelvic floor anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Illustration, Middle Aged, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
