Cited by 402Bone health and osteoporosis researchHip and Femur FracturesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Development and use of FRAX® in osteoporosis

Kanis, J. A., McCloskey, E. V., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Ström, O., Borgström, F.·2010·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

This paper reviews briefly the development and clinical use of FRAX in the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis.Fractures are the clinical consequence of osteoporosis and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several treatments are available that have been shown to decrease the risk of fracture, but problems arise in identifying individuals at high fracture risk so that treatments can be effectively targeted. Case finding can be enhanced by the consideration of clinical risk factors that provide information on fracture risk over and above that provided by bone mineral density measurements. The FRAX tool integrates information on fracture risk from clinical risk factors with or without the use of BMD and can be used to improve the targeting of individuals at high fracture risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-010-1253-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanis, J. A., McCloskey, E. V., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Ström, O., & Borgström, F.
Affiliations
  • Northern General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2010-05-13
Volume
21
Issue
S2
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2015291798
Cited by
402
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
FRAX, osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment, clinical risk factors, bone mineral density, fracture risk prediction, case finding, treatment targeting
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, World Health Organization, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review