The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures
Open accessAbstract
Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem through its association with age-related fractures, most notably those of the proximal femur. Substantial geographic variation has been noted in the incidence of hip fracture throughout the world, and estimates of recent incidence trends have varied widely. Studies in the published literature have reported an increase, plateau, and decrease in age-adjusted incidence rates for hip fracture among both men and women. Accurate characterisation of these temporal trends is important in predicting the health care burden attributable to hip fracture in future decades. We therefore conducted a review of studies worldwide, addressing secular trends in the incidence of hip and other fractures. Studies in western populations, whether in North America, Europe or Oceania, have generally reported increases in hip fracture incidence through the second half of the last century, but those continuing to follow trends over the last two decades have found that rates stabilise with age-adjusted decreases being observed in certain centres. In contrast, some studies suggest that the rate is rising in Asia. This synthesis of temporal trends in the published literature will provide an important resource for preventing fractures. Understanding the reasons for the recent declines in rates of hip fracture may help understand ways to reduce rates of hip fracture worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
Cummings, S. R., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9 · Cited by 3,821
Self-citation
Cited by
Compston, J. E., McClung, M. R., & Leslie, W. D. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32112-3 · Cited by 2,449
Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men
Avenell, A., Mak, J. C., & O'Connell, D. L. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000227.pub4 · Cited by 482
Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age
Ensrud, K. E. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt092 · Cited by 456
Regulation of TNF-Induced Osteoclast Differentiation
Yao, Z., Getting, S. J., & Locke, I. C. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11010132 · Cited by 280
Obesity and fracture in men and women: an epidemiologic perspective
Nielson, C. M., Srikanth, P., & Orwoll, E. S. (2012) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1486 · Cited by 253
Effects of exercise on fracture reduction in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Kemmler, W., Häberle, L., & von Stengel, S. (2013) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2248-7 · Cited by 174
Inacio, M. C., Lang, C., Bray, S. C. E., Visvanathan, R., Whitehead, C., Griffith, E. C., Evans, K., Corlis, M., & Wesselingh, S. (2021) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/imj.14871 · Cited by 91
Chen, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2015) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002276 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- The IOF CSA Working Group on Fracture Epidemiology, Cooper, C., Cole, Z. A., Holroyd, C. R., Earl, S. C., Harvey, N. C., Dennison, E. M., Melton, L. J., Cummings, S. R., & Kanis, J. A.
- Venue
- Osteoporosis International
- Published
- 2011-04-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1277-1288
- ISSN
- 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
- 1433-2965
- OpenAlex
- W2072925975
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 57.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.