Cited by 250Bone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and AnalysisBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Trabecular bone score (TBS): available knowledge, clinical relevance, and future prospects

the Scientific Committee of the GRIO (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur les Ostéoporoses), Bousson, V., Bergot, C., Sutter, B., Levitz, P., Cortet, B.·2012·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis rests on areal bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using DXA. Cancellous bone microarchitecture is a key determinant of bone strength but cannot be measured using DXA. To meet the need for a clinical tool capable of assessing bone microarchitecture, the TBS was developed. The TBS is a texture parameter that evaluates pixel gray-level variations in DXA images of the lumbar spine. The TBS variations may reflect bone microarchitecture. We explain the general principles used to compute the TBS, and we report the correlations between TBS and microarchitectural parameters. Several limitations of the TBS as it is used now are pointed out. We discuss data from currently available clinical studies on the ability of the TBS to identify patients with fractures and to evaluate the fracture risk. We conclude that this new index emphasizes the failure of the BMD T-score to fully capture the fragility fracture risk. However, although microarchitecture may influence the TBS, today, to the best of our understanding, there is no sufficient evidence that a TBS measurement provides reliable information on the status of the bone microarchitecture for a given patient. The TBS depends on gray-level variations and in a projectional image obtained in vivo, these variations can have many causes. Nevertheless, as clinical studies suggest that the TBS predicts the risk of fracture even after adjustment for BMD, we are encouraged to learn more about this score. Additional…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-011-1824-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DXA is considered a gold-standard measurement of BMD, but it cannot assess bone microarchitecture, the most important factor in determining bone quality.

    “Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a gold-standard measurement of BMD, it cannot be employed to assess bone microarchitecture, the most important factor in determining bone quality [10, 14].”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
the Scientific Committee of the GRIO (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur les Ostéoporoses), Bousson, V., Bergot, C., Sutter, B., Levitz, P., & Cortet, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut Calot (FR)
  • Hôpital Roger Salengro (FR)
Corresponding author
Bousson, V.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
1489-1501
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W1993572903
Cited by
250
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
trabecular bone score, bone microarchitecture, osteoporosis, fracture risk prediction, bone mineral density, lumbar spine, gray level variation, trabecular bone, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
MeSH terms
Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Osteoporosis, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Evidence-Based Medicine, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review