The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Using a large cohort of hip fracture patients, we estimated hospital costs to be £14,163 and £2139 in the first and second year following fracture, respectively. Second hip and non-hip fractures were major cost drivers. There is a strong economic incentive to identify cost-effective approaches for hip fracture prevention. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to estimate hospital costs of hip fracture up to 2 years post-fracture and compare costs before and after the index fracture. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged over 60 years admitted with a hip fracture in a UK region between 2003 and 2013 were identified from hospital records and followed until death or administrative censoring. All hospital records were valued using 2012/2013 unit costs, and non-parametric censoring methods were used to adjust for censoring when estimating average annual costs. A generalised linear model examined the main predictors of hospital costs. RESULTS: A cohort of 33,152 patients with a hip fracture was identified (mean age 83 years (SD 8.2). The mean censor-adjusted 1- and 2-year hospital costs after index hip fracture were £14,163 (95 % confidence interval (CI) £14,008 to £14,317) and £16,302 (95 % CI £16,097 to £16,515), respectively. Index admission accounted for 61 % (£8613; 95 % CI £8565 to £8661) of total 1-year hospital costs which were £10,964 higher compared to the year pre-event (p < 0.001). The main predictors of 1-year hospital costs were second hip fracture, other non-hip fragility fractures requiring hospitalisation and hip fracture-related complications. Total UK annual hospital costs associated with incident hip fractures were estimated at £1.1 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital costs following hip fracture are high and mostly occur in the first year after the index hip fracture. Experiencing a second hip fracture after the index fracture accounted for much of the increase in costs. There is a strong economic incentive to prioritise research funds towards identifying the best approaches to prevent both index and subsequent hip fractures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McLellan, A. R., Wolowacz, S. E., Zimovetz, E. A., Beard, S. M., Lock, S., McCrink, L., Adekunle, F., & Roberts, D. (2011) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1534-0 · Cited by 255
Cited by
UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Gregson, C. L., Armstrong, D. J., Bowden, J., Cooper, C., Edwards, J., Gittoes, N. J. L., Harvey, N., Kanis, J., Leyland, S., Low, R., et al. (2022) · Archives of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5 · Cited by 593
Self-citationMalafarina, V., Reginster, J.-Y., Cabrerizo, S., Bruyère, O., Kanis, J. A., Martinez, J. A., & Zulet, M. A. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10050555 · Cited by 341
Gilboa, Y., Maeir, T., Karni, S., Eisenberg, M. E., Liebergall, M., Schwartz, I., & Kaufman, Y. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1141-z · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- The REFReSH study group, Leal, J., Gray, A. M., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Arden, N. K., Cooper, C., Javaid, M. K., & Judge, A.
- Venue
- Osteoporosis International
- Published
- 2015-08-19
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 549-558
- ISSN
- 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
- 1433-2965
- OpenAlex
- W1558236383
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00198-015-3277-9
- The paper
- The REFReSH study group, Leal, J., Gray, A. M., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Arden, N. K., Cooper, C., Javaid, M. K., & Judge, A. (2016). Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study. Osteoporosis International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3277-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.