Cited by 16Bone health and osteoporosis researchHormonal and reproductive studiesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Sex hormone-binding globulin and risk of fracture in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Hidayat, K., Du, X., Shi, B.-M.·2018·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of observational study to clarify the association between sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels and the risk of fracture in older adults. We found that higher SHBG levels were associated with an increased risk of fracture in older adults. Introduction The association between SHBG levels and the risk of fracture in older adults remains elusive. We aim to clarify this association by conducting a meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant observational studies investigating the association between SHBG levels and the risk of fracture in older adults. The relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were transformed into a continuous variable for each 1 μg/dL increase in SHBG and were pooled under a random-effects model. Results A total of 16 observational studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The summary RR of fracture risk associated with each 1 μg/dL increase in SHBG was 1.18 (95% CI 1.11, 1.26); no statistically significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.67). The positive association was also evident in men (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12, 1.33) and women (RR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.05, 1.26). By site of fracture, higher SHBG levels were positively associated with higher risks of hip fracture (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23, 1.65), vertebral fracture (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12, 1.54), and non-vertebral fracture (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06, 1.38)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-018-4600-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hidayat, K., Du, X., & Shi, B.-M.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hidayat, K.
  • Shi, B.-M.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2018-07-24
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2171-2180
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2884493206
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau (SYS201741)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
sex hormone-binding globulin, fracture risk, older adults, hip fracture, vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures, sex differences, osteoporosis biomarkers
MeSH terms
Hip Fractures, Humans, Risk Factors, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Biomarkers, Spinal Fractures, Osteoporotic Fractures, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review