Cited by 114Bone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and AnalysisScoliosis diagnosis and treatment

X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine

Löffler, M.T., Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Valentinitsch, A., Noël, P.B., Kirschke, J.S., Baum, T.·2020·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease with a high prevalence that affects the population worldwide, particularly the elderly. It is often due to fractures associated with bone fragility that the diagnosis of osteoporosis becomes clinically evident. However, early diagnosis would be necessary to initiate therapy and to prevent occurrence of further fractures, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. X-ray-based imaging plays a key role for fracture risk assessment and monitoring of osteoporosis. Whereas over decades dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the main method used and still reflects the reference standard, another modality reemerges with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) because of its three-dimensional advantages and the opportunistic exploitation of routine CT scans. Against this background, this article intends to review and evaluate recent advances in the field of X-ray-based quantitative imaging of osteoporosis at the spine. First, standard DXA with the recent addition of trabecular bone score (TBS) is presented. Secondly, standard QCT, dual-energy BMD quantification, and opportunistic BMD screening in non-dedicated CT exams are discussed. Lastly, finite element analysis and microstructural parameter analysis are reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-019-05212-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löffler, M. T., Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Valentinitsch, A., Noël, P. B., Kirschke, J. S., & Baum, T.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Löffler, M.T.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
233-250
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2989237143
Cited by
114
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
european research council H2020 (637154)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
osteoporosis, spine, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, trabecular bone score, finite element analysis, bone microarchitecture, fracture risk assessment, bone fragility
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Osteoporosis, Spine, X-Rays, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review