X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease with a high prevalence that affects the population worldwide, particularly the elderly. It is often due to fractures associated with bone fragility that the diagnosis of osteoporosis becomes clinically evident. However, early diagnosis would be necessary to initiate therapy and to prevent occurrence of further fractures, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. X-ray-based imaging plays a key role for fracture risk assessment and monitoring of osteoporosis. Whereas over decades dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the main method used and still reflects the reference standard, another modality reemerges with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) because of its three-dimensional advantages and the opportunistic exploitation of routine CT scans. Against this background, this article intends to review and evaluate recent advances in the field of X-ray-based quantitative imaging of osteoporosis at the spine. First, standard DXA with the recent addition of trabecular bone score (TBS) is presented. Secondly, standard QCT, dual-energy BMD quantification, and opportunistic BMD screening in non-dedicated CT exams are discussed. Lastly, finite element analysis and microstructural parameter analysis are reviewed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Opportunistic quantitative evaluation of preexisting clinical routine CT entails neither additional costs nor radiation exposure.
“Opportunistic quantitative evaluation of preexisting clinical routing CT entails neither additional costs nor radiation exposure [15].”
From Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has limited availability, is more expensive, and is associated with a substantially higher radiation dose (>100-fold).
“Yet, other methods of bone densitometry exhibit even more disadvantages: quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has limited availability, is more expensive, and is associated with a substantially higher radiation dose (> 100-fold) [15].”
From Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, D. (2001) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.285.6.785 · Cited by 5,529 · see citing works
Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
Cosman, F., de Beur, S. J., LeBoff, M. S., Lewiecki, E. M., Tanner, B., Randall, S., & Lindsay, R. (2014) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2 · Cited by 4,149 · see citing works
Dempster, D. W., Compston, J. E., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., Kanis, J. A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P. J., Ott, S. M., Recker, R. R., & Parfitt, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1805 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Löffler, M. T., Jacob, A., Scharr, A., Sollmann, N., Burian, E., El Husseini, M., Sekuboyina, A., Tetteh, G., Zimmer, C., Gempt, J., et al. (2021) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07655-2 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“Some automatic tools use HU as a proxy for BMD [34], which is a method that is expected to produce inaccuracies due to its lack of scanner-specific calibration to bone [35] as well as high variations due to presence of contrast material [15, 36, 37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Löffler, M. T., Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Valentinitsch, A., Noël, P. B., Kirschke, J. S., & Baum, T.
- Affiliations
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Löffler, M.T.
- Venue
- Osteoporosis International
- Published
- 2019-11-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-250
- ISSN
- 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
- 1433-2965
- OpenAlex
- W2989237143
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- european research council H2020 (637154)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Keywords
- osteoporosis, spine, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, trabecular bone score, finite element analysis, bone microarchitecture, fracture risk assessment, bone fragility
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Humans, Osteoporosis, Spine, X-Rays, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review