Cited by 19Connective tissue disorders researchBone health and osteoporosis researchDermatological and Skeletal Disorders

Higher fracture prevalence and smaller bone size in patients with hEDS/HSD—a prospective cohort study

Banica, T., Coussens, M., Verroken, C., Calders, P., De Wandele, I., Malfait, F., Zmierczak, H.-G., Goemaere, S. +2 more·2020·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Increased fracture risk in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes has been reported, but the reasons for it are incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate possible determinants of this increased risk and found that hEDS/HSD patients present with a cortical bone size deficit compared with control subjects, possibly related to lower mechanical loading. Introduction The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) comprise a group of heritable connective tissue disorders caused by defects in the biosynthesis, secretion, and/or organization of fibrillar collagens which might impair bone strength. Our aim was to compare fracture prevalence, volumetric and areal bone mineral density (BMD), bone geometry, muscle size and the muscle-bone interaction, body composition and longitudinal changes therein between patients with hypermobile EDS (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), and healthy control subjects. Methods Cross-sectional data comprised 39 female hEDS/HSD patients (age 41 ± 11 years) and 43 age-matched controls. After 8 years, 27 hEDS/HSD and 17 control subjects were re-evaluated. Tibial trabecular and cortical volumetric BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), cortical bone geometry, and lower leg muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured using pQCT. Body composition, areal BMD, and BMC were determined by DXA. Results At baseline, patients with hEDS/HSD presented with a smaller cortical bone area, smaller cortical thickness and muscle CSA, and a higher fracture prevalence than…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-019-05269-z

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banica, T., Coussens, M., Verroken, C., Calders, P., De Wandele, I., Malfait, F., Zmierczak, H.-G., Goemaere, S., Lapauw, B., & Rombaut, L.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Banica, T.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2019-12-24
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
849-856
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2996061948
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Gent (BOFMET2015000401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Keywords
hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility spectrum disorders, fracture risk, cortical bone thickness, bone geometry, muscle cross-sectional area, muscle-bone interaction, mechanical loading, bone mineral density, body composition, connective tissue diseases, collagen defects
MeSH terms
Adult, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Bone Density, Prevalence, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review