Cited by 66Connective tissue disorders researchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Are patients with hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorder so different?

Open access
Aubry-Rozier, Bérengère, Schwitzguebel, Adrien, Valerio, Flore, Tanniger, Joelle, Paquier, Célia, Berna, Chantal, Hügle, Thomas, Benaim, Charles·2021·Rheumatology International

Abstract

Diagnosing hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) remains challenging, despite new 2017 criteria. Patients not fulfilling these criteria are considered to have hypermobile spectrum disorder (HSD). Our first aim was to evaluate whether patients hEDS were more severely affected and had higher prevalence of extra-articular manifestations than HSD. Second aim was to compare their outcome after coordinated physical therapy. Patients fulfilling hEDS/HSD criteria were included in this real-life prospective cohort (November 2017/April 2019). They completed a 16-item Clinical Severity Score (CSS-16). We recorded bone involvement, neuropathic pain (DN4) and symptoms of mast cell disorders (MCAS) as extra-articular manifestations. After a standardized initial evaluation (T0), all patients were offered the same coordinated physical therapy, were followed-up at 6 months (T1) and at least 1 year later (T2), and were asked whether or not their condition had subjectively improved at T2. We included 97 patients (61 hEDS, 36 HSD). Median age was 40 (range 18–73); 92.7% were females. Three items from CSS-16 (pain, motricity problems, and bleeding) were significantly more severe with hEDS than HSD. Bone fragility, neuropathic pain and MCAS were equally prevalent. At T2 (20 months [range 18–26]) 54% of patients reported improvement (no difference between groups). On multivariable analysis, only family history of hypermobility predicted (favorable) outcome ( p = 0.01). hEDS and HDS patients showed similar disease severity score except for pain, motricity problems and bleeding, and similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations. Long-term improvement was observed in > 50% of patients in both groups. These results add weight to a clinical pragmatic proposition to consider hEDS/HSD as a single entity that requires the same treatments.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a prospective Swiss cohort of 97 adults with symptomatic generalized hypermobility, patients classified as hEDS and HSD had broadly similar disease severity and extra-articular manifestations, with only pain, motricity problems, and bleeding significantly worse in hEDS. More than half of patients in both groups reported improvement after coordinated physical therapy, supporting the pragmatic view that hEDS/HSD may be considered a single entity requiring the same treatments.

Key findings

  • Among 97 patients (61 hEDS, 36 HSD; median age 40 years, 92.7% female), total CSS-16 severity was higher in hEDS than HSD (40.0 [31.0–52.0] vs. 31.5 [22.3–35.0], p = 0.04), but only pain, motricity problems, and bleeding were significantly more severe among the 16 items.
  • Extra-articular manifestations were equally prevalent: bone fragility 23% vs. 28%, DN4-positive neuropathic pain 47% vs. 49%, and suspected MCAS 43% vs. 50% in hEDS vs. HSD, with no significant differences.
  • At T2 (median 20 months [18–26]), 54% of patients reported improvement, with no significant difference between hEDS and HSD (56% vs. 50%, p = 0.77).
  • On multivariable analysis, only family history of hypermobility independently predicted favorable outcome (p = 0.01).

Methods

  • Real-life prospective cohort conducted at a single Swiss reference center (Lausanne University Hospital) between November 2017 and April 2019; adults with symptomatic generalized hypermobility were classified by the 2017 hEDS/HSD criteria.
  • Patients completed the 16-item Clinical Severity Score (CSS-16), Beighton score, and assessments for bone involvement, neuropathic pain (DN4 > 4/10), and suspected MCAS; all were offered the same coordinated physical therapy and followed at 6 months (T1) and at least 1 year later (T2).
  • Comparisons used Mann–Whitney U-test, chi-square or Fisher exact tests; factors with p < 0.10 on univariate analysis were entered into multivariable logistic regression (p ≤ 0.05).

Limitations

  • The authors state this was a monocentric study in a small country, used mostly subjective or detection tools, and that the CSS-16 is not validated for sensitivity/specificity in hEDS/HSD or against other disorders such as fibromyalgia.
  • The authors state that global evolution was a composite self-report regarding pain, disability, injury, and empowerment, so individual elements could not be analyzed separately, and reasons for loss to follow-up were not assessed, potentially biasing results.
  • Evident from the text: follow-up data were available for only 59 of 97 patients at T2 (61%), and loss to follow-up was higher in the HSD than hEDS group (56% vs. 30%, p = 0.02), with lost patients at T1 having lower CSS-16 scores.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00296-021-04968-3

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 35 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    On multivariable analysis, only family history of hypermobility was an independent predictor of favorable outcome at T2 (p=0.01).

    “On multivariate analysis, only family history of hypermobility was an independent predictor of (favorable) outcome (p = 0.01).”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “On multivariable analysis, only family history of hypermobility predicted (favorable) outcome (p = 0.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.
  • Findingown data

    On univariate analyses, family history of hypermobility was associated with better prognosis at T2 (p=0.07).

    “On univariate analyses, factors associated with better prognosis at T2 were the initial intensity of pain (p = 0.05), sleep disturbance (p = 0.06), family history of hypermobility (p = 0.07) and DN4 positivity (p = 0.04) (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.
  • Findingown data

    There was no significant difference between hEDS and HSD in improvement at T1 (38% vs 35%, p=1.00).

    “The slight percentage difference in improvement favoring the hEDS group was not significant (T1: 38% vs. 35%, p = 1.00; T2: 56% vs. 50%, p = 0.77).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.
  • Findingown data

    hEDS patients had significantly higher total CSS-16 scores than HSD patients (median 40.0 vs 31.5, p=0.04).

    “CSS-16 scores were significantly higher for hEDS than HSD patients (40.0[31.0–52.0] vs. 31.5[22.3–35.0], p = 0.04)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CSS-16 total score is a valid measure of overall clinical severity in hEDS/HSD despite not being validated for sensitivity and specificity.
  • Findingown data

    At T1 (6 months), 36.8% of patients reported improvement.

    “In total, 28 (36.8%) patients considered their condition improved at T1 and 32 (54%) at T2 (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fatigue, sleep disturbance, dysautonomia, and gastrointestinal symptoms were severe in >40% of patients.

    “Fatigue, sleep disturbance, dysautonomia and gastrointestinal symptoms were severe in > 40% of patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Bone fragility, neuropathic pain (DN4 >4/10), and suspected MCAS were equally prevalent in hEDS and HSD patients.

    “The proportion of patients with anamnestic bone fragility was 23% and 28% in the hEDS and HSD groups, DN4 score > 4 was 47% and 49%, and suspected MCAS 43% and 50%, with no significant difference.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “Bone fragility, neuropathic pain and MCAS were equally prevalent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Suspected MCAS based on coexistence of flush and/or dermographia reflects mast cell activation syndrome.
    • Rests on an assumption: Anamnestic bone fragility (non-traumatic fractures and low BMD) reflects bone involvement in hEDS/HSD.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All included patients reported pain, and most (82%) had a severe score (≥3/4).

    “All included patients reported pain, (Table 1) most (82%) with a severe score (≥ 3/4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 2017 criteria 2A (>5 systemic manifestations), 2B (positive family history), and 2C (musculoskeletal involvement) were more often present in hEDS than HSD patients.

    “Criteria 2017 “2” and “3” were by definition more often present in hEDS than HSD patients: the proportion of > 5 systemic manifestations (criterion 2A) was 18% and 0% (p < 10–2), positive family history (2B) 93% and 33% (p < 10–4), and musculoskeletal pain or chronic or recurrent dislocations (2C) 98% and 75% (p < 10–3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the cohort, hEDS patients had significantly more pain, disability, and hypermobility than HSD patients.

    “In our cohort, hEDS patients presented a more severe phenotype than did HSD patients: significantly more pain, disability and hypermobility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The proportion of women, mean age, prevalence of pain, and fatigue in the sample are similar to those in prior studies.

    “Reassuringly, the proportion of women [16, 17], mean age, prevalence of pain, and fatigue are similar to that in prior studies [16, 17, 40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] McGillis L, Mittal N, Santa Mina D et al (2020) Utilization of the 2017 diagnostic criteria for hEDS by the Toronto GoodHope Ehlers-Danlos syndrome clinic: a retrospective review. Am J Med Genet A 182:484–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61459 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] Copetti M, Morlino S, Colombi M et al (2019) Severity classes in adults with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders: a pilot study of 105 Italian patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58:1722–1730. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez029 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Tinkle BT (2020) Symptomatic joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 34:101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2020.101508 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among patients lost to follow-up, CSS-16 scores were lower and the proportion of HSD diagnoses was higher than hEDS.

    “Among patients lost to follow-up, we found lower CSS-16 scores and a higher proportion of HSD diagnoses than hEDS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the cohort, hEDS and HSD patients showed globally similar severity scores except for pain, motricity problems and spontaneous bleeding, and similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations.

    “Based on a clinical severity scale of 16 items, in our cohort, patients with hEDS fulfilling the 2017 diagnostic criteria and HSD patients showed globally similar severity scores except for pain, motricity problems and spontaneous bleeding, and similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CSS-16, despite not being validated, is adequate to compare severity between hEDS and HSD patients.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Follow-up data were available for 76 patients at T1 (78%) and 59 at T2 (61%).

    “Follow-up data were available for 76 patients at T1 (78%) and 59 at T2 (61%), with a mean follow-up time of 6(6–10) and 20(18–26) months, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The CSS-16 pragmatically reflects the authors' clinical evaluation.

    “but pragmatically reflects our clinical evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    These results add weight to a clinical pragmatic proposition to consider hEDS/HSD as a single entity that requires the same treatments.

    “These results add weight to a clinical pragmatic proposition to consider hEDS/HSD as a single entity that requires the same treatments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CSS-16 total score is a valid measure of overall clinical severity in hEDS/HSD despite not being validated for sensitivity and specificity.
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    hEDS and HSD exist on the same physiological continuum, with hEDS being a more marked form.

    “very recent studies consider that hEDS and HSD exist on the same physiological continuum (hEDS being a more marked form) [22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Atwell K, Michael W, Dubey J et al (2021) Diagnosis and management of hypermobility spectrum disorders in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 34:838–848. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200374 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    hEDS and HSD require the same pattern of multidisciplinary intervention.

    “require the same pattern of multidisciplinary intervention [23, 24]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Yew KS, Kamps-Schmitt KA, Borge R (2021) Hypermobile ehlers-danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders. Am Fam Physician 103:481–492

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Bennett SE, Walsh N, Moss T, Palmer S (2021) Developing a self-management intervention to manage hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS): an analysis informed by behaviour change theory. Disabil Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1933618 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    hEDS and HSD are gathered in the same category for research purposes.

    “or are gathered in the same category for research purposes [25, 26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] Demes JS, McNair B, Taylor MRG (2020) Use of complementary therapies for chronic pain management in patients with reported Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorders. Am J Med Genet A 182:2611–2623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61837 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Vermeulen S, De Mits S, De Ridder R et al (2020) Altered multi-segment ankle and foot kinematics during gait in patients with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/Hypermobility spectrum disorder. A case-control study Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24526 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    No gene has been identified for hEDS.

    “no gene has been identified for hEDS [11, 14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P et al (2017) The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 175:8–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31552 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] De Wandele I, Calders P, Peersman W et al (2014) Autonomic symptom burden in the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a comparative study with two other EDS types, fibromyalgia, and healthy controls. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Patients lost to follow-up at T2 had a slightly lower but not significantly different CSS-16 score than those not lost (32.5 vs 34.0, p=0.12).

    “Patients lost to follow-up at T2 had a slightly lower but not significantly CSS-16 score than those not lost to follow-up (32.5[24.0–35.3] vs. 34.0[27.0–41.0], p = 0.12)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The CSS-16 scale has not been validated for sensitivity and specificity for hEDS/HSD.

    “The scale has not been validated in terms of sensitivity and specificity for hESD/HSD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neuropathic pain has been described as related to small-fiber neuropathy in HSD/hEDS and to nerve luxation/subluxation related to hypermobility.

    “Neuropathic pain has been described as related to small-fiber neuropathy in HSD/hEDS [19] as well as to the well-known nerve luxation/subluxation related to the hypermobility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Cazzato D, Castori M, Lombardi R et al (2016) Small fiber neuropathy is a common feature of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Neurology 87:155–159. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002847 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    None of the prior studies suggested a difference between hEDS and HSD patients, but a high prevalence of bone involvement seems confirmed.

    “None of these prior studies suggested a difference between hEDS and HSD patients, but a high prevalence of bone involvement seems confirmed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Eller-Vainicher C, Bassotti A, Imeraj A et al (2016) Bone involvement in adult patients affected with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Osteoporos Int 27:2525–2531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3562-2 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] Formenti AM, Doga M, Frara S et al (2019) Skeletal fragility: an emerging complication of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Endocrine 63:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1822-y source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] Banica T, Coussens M, Verroken C et al (2020) Higher fracture prevalence and smaller bone size in patients with hEDS/HSD-a prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 31:849–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05269-z source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not record evolution reports for pain, disability, injury and empowerment separately, so it could not study whether pain decreased.

    “We did not record evolution reports for these elements separately, and therefore could not study whether pain was decreased, for example.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The 2017 criteria were proposed to avoid neglecting a potentially severe disorder and to limit overemphasizing a non-pathological variation from the norm.

    “The 2017 criteria were proposed to avoid neglecting a potentially severe disorder and to limit overemphasizing a non-pathological variation from the norm [15].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Tinkle B, Castori M, Berglund B et al (2017) Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): Clinical description and natural history. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 175:48–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31538 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was monocentric in a small country, but it is the referral center.

    “This was a monocentric study in a small country, yet as described above, it is the referral center, which holds its importance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    To improve, treat and prevent musculoskeletal manifestations of joint hypermobility, education, active participation and active physical therapy intervention are recommended.

    “Generally, to improve, treat and prevent musculoskeletal manifestations of joint hypermobility, the facets of education, active participation and active physical therapy intervention are recommended. [23, 24, 40–43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [23] Yew KS, Kamps-Schmitt KA, Borge R (2021) Hypermobile ehlers-danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders. Am Fam Physician 103:481–492

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Bennett SE, Walsh N, Moss T, Palmer S (2021) Developing a self-management intervention to manage hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS): an analysis informed by behaviour change theory. Disabil Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1933618 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Tinkle BT (2020) Symptomatic joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 34:101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2020.101508 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] Coussens M, Calders P, Lapauw B et al (2021) Does muscle strength change over time in patients with hypermobile ehlers-danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder? an eight-year follow-up study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 73:1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24220 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] Scheper MC, Juul-Kristensen B, Rombaut L et al (2016) Disability in adolescents and adults diagnosed with hypermobility-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97:2174–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Engelbert RHH, Juul-Kristensen B, Pacey V et al (2017) The evidence-based rationale for physical therapy treatment of children, adolescents, and adults diagnosed with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobile Ehlers Danlos syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 175:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31545 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Strong evidence for physical therapy is lacking, yet it is the mainstay of management.

    “Strong evidence for physical therapy is lacking [39], yet it is the mainstay of management [8, 40, 41].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [39] Simmonds JV, Herbland A, Hakim A et al (2019) Exercise beliefs and behaviours of individuals with Joint Hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome - hypermobility type. Disabil Rehabil 41:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1398278 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Corrado B, Ciardi G (2018) Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and rehabilitation: taking stock of evidence based medicine: a systematic review of the literature. J Phys Ther Sci 30:843–847. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.847 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Tinkle BT (2020) Symptomatic joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 34:101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2020.101508 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] Coussens M, Calders P, Lapauw B et al (2021) Does muscle strength change over time in patients with hypermobile ehlers-danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder? an eight-year follow-up study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 73:1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24220 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was not able to assess the reason for lost to follow-up because it was the patients' decision not to return to clinical care, and it would have been invasive to ask them.

    “Unfortunately, we were not able to assess the reason for lost to follow-up because it was the patients’ decision not to return to clinical care, and it would have been invasive to ask them the reason for this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It could be a bias of over-positivity of MCAS symptoms in our cohort.

    “Therefore, it could be a bias of over-positivity of MCAS symptoms in our cohort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The scores used were mostly subjective or detection tools.

    “The scores used were mostly subjective or detection tools, which are convenient to use in a clinical setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reason for lost to follow-up could be a bias in the results (underestimation or overestimation of effects).

    “The reason could be a bias in the results we present (underestimation of effects with more loss of patients with great improvement or over-estimation with more loss of patients with deterioration).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The 2017 criteria of hEDS limits the diagnosis to patients with clear Mendelian transmission or those with extra-articular and systemic manifestation.

    “Thus, the 2017 criteria of hEDS limits the diagnosis to patients with clear Mendelian transmission or those with extra-articular and systemic manifestation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Tinkle B, Castori M, Berglund B et al (2017) Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): Clinical description and natural history. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 175:48–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31538 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A diagnosis is important because the therapeutic approach is different: medication for primary neuropathic pain versus proprioceptive control or surgery for hypermobility-related pain.

    “A diagnosis is important because the therapeutic approach is different: medication for primary neuropathic pain versus proprioceptive control or surgery for hypermobility-related pain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    hEDS and HSD patients showed similar disease severity scores except for pain, motricity problems, and bleeding, and a similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations.

    “hEDS and HDS patients showed similar disease severity score except for pain, motricity problems and bleeding, and similar spectrum of extra-articular manifestations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CSS-16 total score is a valid measure of overall clinical severity in hEDS/HSD despite not being validated for sensitivity and specificity.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Chronic pain is an important problem for HSD/hEDS patients.

    “Chronic pain is an important problem for HSD/hEDS patients [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Syx D, De Wandele I, Rombaut L, Malfait F (2017) Hypermobility, the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and chronic pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol 35(Suppl 107):116–122

      Not checked in the free run.

32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CSS-16 total score is a valid measure of overall clinical severity in hEDS/HSD despite not being validated for sensitivity and specificity.

    “The scale has not been validated in terms of sensitivity and specificity for hESD/HSD but pragmatically reflects our clinical evaluation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported improvement at T2 is a valid measure of mid-term evolution.

    “At T1 and T2, patients were asked to consider pain, disability, injury and empowerment together in answering the following question: “Compared to the initial assessment, how do you now consider yourself regarding pain, disability, injury and empowerment?”, with possible answers of improved/not improved.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Suspected MCAS based on coexistence of flush and/or dermographia reflects mast cell activation syndrome.

    “Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) was clinically suspected if the patient reported the coexistence of flush and/or dermographia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anamnestic bone fragility (non-traumatic fractures and low BMD) reflects bone involvement in hEDS/HSD.

    “Bone involvement was assessed by a question assessing the prevalence of non-traumatic fractures and personal history of low bone mineral density (BMD).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The severity of symptoms and a clear diagnosis are motivational factors for attending a tertiary center.

    “We can reasonably assume that the severity of symptoms and a clear diagnosis are motivational factors for attending a tertiary center.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The global evolution composite self-report is a valid measure of improvement in pain, disability, injury and empowerment.

    “The global evolution is a composite self-report regarding pain, disability, injury and empowerment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CSS-16, despite not being validated, is adequate to compare severity between hEDS and HSD patients.

    “The CSS-16 is not validated, and its sensitivity and specificity for hEDS or compared to other disorders such as fibromyalgia is not known.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The observed improvement in articular symptoms is attributable to the coordinated physical therapy program rather than to other factors.

    “With our program, more than 50% of patients showed improved articular symptoms at the end of follow-up.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Some hEDS patients are reported not to meet a required criterion

    Major

    The methods require patients classified as hEDS to meet all three criteria, including criterion 1. Table 1 reports criterion 1 as positive for only 90% of the hEDS group.

  • Conclusion calls total severity scores similar despite a significant difference

    Minor

    The conclusion describes the groups as having globally similar severity scores, but Table 1 reports a significantly higher CSS-16 total score for hEDS (40.0 versus 31.5; p = 0.04).

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Ferranti SD KE. Physical activity and exercise in patients with congenital heath disease, Literature review current through: Feb 2019. 2019;[cited 2019 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/physical-activityand-exercise-in-pat - Search Results. In: PubMed. Accessed 2 Aug 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aubry-Rozier, B., Schwitzguebel, A., Valerio, F., Tanniger, J., Paquier, C., Berna, C., Hügle, T., & Benaim, C.
Affiliations
  • HFR Freiburg Kantonsspital (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Rheumatology International
Published
2021-08-16
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1785-1794
ISSN
  • 0172-8172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-160X
OpenAlex
W3194985992
Cited by
66
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rheumatology International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Université de Lausanne
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility spectrum disorders, disease severity, extra-articular manifestations, neuropathic pain, mast cell activation syndrome, bone fragility, treatment outcomes, clinical severity score
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Physical Therapy Modalities, Patient Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review