Electrolytic lesions and pharmacological inhibition of the dorsal raphe nucleus prevent stressor potentiation of morphine conditioned place preference in rats
Abstract
Rationale Exposure to a single session of uncontrollable inescapable shock (IS), but not to identical controllable escapable shock, produces a potentiation of morphine's rewarding properties that is unusual in that the stressor can be given a number of days before the drug administration in an environment quite different from the drug context. Many other behavioral outcomes of stressors that depend on the uncontrollability of the stressor are mediated by alterations in serotonergic (5-HT) neurons within the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). Objectives The present experiments examined the role of the DRN and 5-HT in mediating the effect of IS on the rewarding properties of morphine as assessed by conditioned place preference (CPP). Methods In experiment 1, subjects received small electrolytic lesions of the DRN and were tested for morphine (3.0 mg/kg, SC) CPP after IS or control treatment. In experiment 2, subjects received an intra-DRN microinjection of the 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 1.0 microg/0.5 microl) either before IS or before morphine (3.0 mg/kg, SC) injections during CPP testing. Results IS potentiated morphine CPP in controls, but both DRN lesion and intra-DRN 8-OH-DPAT, either before IS or before morphine administration, completely blocked this effect. Conclusions These data implicate alterations in DRN 5-HT neurons in the potentiation of morphine reward produced by uncontrollable stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blocking DRN activation during inescapable shock by lesion or by microinjection of agents that prevent DRN 5-HT activation prevented the usual poor escape and heightened anxiety, and the animals behaved like non-shocked controls.
“These treatments all prevented inescapable shock from producing its usual poor escape and heightened anxiety, and these subjects behaved as did non-shocked controls.”
From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Will et al., 2004
Cites
Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3 · Cited by 2,494 · see citing works
Self-citationA PHA-L analysis of ascending projections of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat
Vertes, R. P. (1991) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903130409 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tzschentke, T. M. (2007) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00070.x · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience.
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000033 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
“Here, activation of the dorsal raphe nucleus during inescapable shock was prevented by either lesion (Maier et al., 1993; Will et al., 2004) or microinjection of pharmacological agents that prevent dorsal raphe nucleus 5-HT activation (Maier, Grahn, & Watkins, 1995; Maier, Kalman, & Grahn, 1994).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMaier, S. F., & Watkins, L. R. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.021 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Self-citationDer-Avakian, A., Will, M. J., Bland, S. T., Deak, T., Nguyen, K. T., Schmid, M. J., Spencer, R. L., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F. (2005) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2041-1 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Will, M. J., Der-Avakian, A., Bland, S. T., Grahn, R. E., Hammack, S. E., Sparks, P. D., Pepin, J. L., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Connecticut College (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maier, Steven F.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-198
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2086360163
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA013159, DA 13159)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- dorsal raphe nucleus, serotonin, morphine, conditioned place preference, escapable shock, 8-OH-DPAT, 5-HT1A receptor, drug reward, serotonergic neurons, electrolytic lesions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Electrolysis, Electroshock, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Microinjections, Morphine, Raphe Nuclei, Reward, Serotonin, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, Rats, Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review