Cited by 63Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Acute opioid dependence: characterizing the early adaptations underlying drug withdrawal

Harris, Andrew C., Gewirtz, Jonathan C.·2005·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale While opioid withdrawal is typically studied under conditions of chronic (i.e., continuous) drug administration, withdrawal signs can also be demonstrated in both humans and animals after a single opioid exposure. This phenomenon, termed acute dependence, may be useful in understanding the early stages of opioid dependence and addiction. Objective This review provides an overview of acute dependence by comparing withdrawal from acute and chronic opioid exposure across dimensions ranging from symptomatology to neural substrates. Assessment of repeated withdrawals from acute opioid administration is also presented as a tool for better understanding the adaptive changes induced by multiple drug exposures. Conclusions Although not identical phenomena, acute and chronic dependence share a number of characteristics. Examining potentiations of withdrawal severity across multiple acute opioid exposures may be especially valuable in characterizing the development of drug dependence. Further study of acute dependence promises to lead to more effective treatments for opioid withdrawal and addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-005-2155-0

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Norepinephrine activation has long been hypothesized to be involved in opioid withdrawal in animals and in humans.

    “Norepinephrine activation has long been hypothesized to be involved in opioid withdrawal in animals, based on neurobiological measures and the pharmacology of withdrawal (Maldonado, 1997), and in humans, based largely on pharmacological studies of opioid withdrawal (Gold et al., 1978;Harris and Gewirtz, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Harris, A. C., & Gewirtz, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Gewirtz, Jonathan C.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2005-02-05
Volume
178
Issue
4
Pages
353-366
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2064677610
Cited by
63
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32-DA-07097, T32DA007097)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
opioid withdrawal, chronic opioid exposure, opioid use disorder, repeated drug exposure
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Psychopharmacology, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review