Cited by 21Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Differential attenuation of d-amphetamine-induced disruption of conditional discrimination performance by dopamine and serotonin antagonists

Dunn, Michael J., Killcross, Simon·2006·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Recent experimental findings suggest that a core cognitive deficit of schizophrenia is the degraded ability to use task-setting cues to guide goal-directed behaviour, that this deficit is evident in acute as well as chronic schizophrenia, and that such deficits can me modelled in animals using conditional discrimination tasks. Objective To establish the reversal potential of D1, D2 and 5-HT receptor antagonists acutely, and D1 and D2 receptor antagonists chronically, on d-amphetamine-induced disruption of a conditional discrimination task that depends on the ability to use task-setting cues to direct goal directed performance. Method A conditional discrimination paradigm was employed in which rats learned to respond on an appropriate lever, conditional upon specific auditory stimuli. Results d-Amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) disruption of conditional discrimination was attenuated by acute pre-treatment with the selective D1 antagonist SCH 23390 and the atypical anti-psychotic clozapine (Cloz). Acute pre-treatment with the selective D2 antagonist eticlopride (Eti) and the anti-psychotic haloperidol (Hal) failed to reverse d-amphetamine disruption, as did pre-treatment with the selective 5HT1A antagonist WAY 100635 and the selective 5HT2A/C antagonist ritanserin. However, Eti and Hal did reverse d-amphetamine-induced task disruption when administered chronically (as did SCH 23390, alpha-flupenthixol and Cloz). Conclusions These results suggest that D1 receptors are involved i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-006-0488-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, M. J., & Killcross, S.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Michael J.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-08-30
Volume
188
Issue
2
Pages
183-192
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2063813481
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
d-amphetamine, conditional discrimination, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, 5-HT1A receptor, schizophrenia, goal-directed behavior, 5-HT receptor antagonists, clozapine, haloperidol, eticlopride, WAY-100635, ritanserin, alpha-flupenthixol, SCH 23390
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Dextroamphetamine, Discrimination Learning, Extinction, Psychological, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Serotonin Antagonists, Time Factors, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Dopamine Antagonists, Rats, Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Antagonists, Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists, Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review