Cited by 97Smoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

A double-blind placebo controlled experimental study of nicotine: I—effects on incentive motivation

Open access
Dawkins, Lynne, Powell, Jane H., West, Robert, Powell, John, Pickering, Alan·2006·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Brain reward pathways implicated in addiction appear to be less reactive in regular drug users; behavioural manifestations may include decreased sensitivity to natural reinforcers.Objectives This study aimed to replicate earlier findings of abstinence-associated incentive motivation deficits in smokers and to determine whether these can be reversed with nicotine in the form of lozenge.Methods One hundred forty-five smokers were each tested twice, once after receiving nicotine, and once after receiving placebo lozenge in counterbalanced order. Participants completed various tests of incentive motivational functioning: a measure of subjective enjoyment, the Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS); a simple card sorting task, the card arranging reward responsivity objective test (CARROT) with and without financial incentive; the modified emotional Stroop test; a cue-reactivity task; and a novel reaction time task to explore effects of signals of reward, the incentive motivational enhancement of response speed task.Results Compared with performance during abstinence (placebo condition), nicotine was associated with: higher self-reported pleasure expectations on the SHAPS; enhanced responsiveness to financial reward on the CARROT in smokers who smoked 15 or more cigarettes a day; and greater interference from appetitive words on the Stroop task.Conclusions These results are generally consistent with contemporary neurobiological theories of addiction and suggest that short-term smoking abstinence is associated with impaired reward motivation which can be reversed with nicotine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-006-0588-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smokers experience a reduced capacity to gain enjoyment from and be rewarded by other stimuli, which probably results from a rebound of the effect of nicotine in acting as a pleasure amplifier.

    “Smokers also experience a reduced capacity to gain enjoyment from and be rewarded by other stimuli, which probably results from a rebound of the effect of nicotine in acting as a pleasure amplifier, as described earlier (22).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 97

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Willner P, Scheel-Kruger J (eds) The Mesolimbic Dopamine System: From Motivation to Action. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp 301-330

Authors
Dawkins, L., Powell, J. H., West, R., Powell, J., & Pickering, A.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Dawkins, Lynne
  • Powell, Jane H.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-10-18
Volume
189
Issue
3
Pages
355-367
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2057191984
Cited by
97
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 3527427)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
nicotine, smoking abstinence, incentive motivation, reward processing, smokers, nicotine lozenges, monetary rewards, Stroop interference, cue reactivity, addiction, brain reward system
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nicotine, Reward, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Smoking Cessation, Nicotinic Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review