Cited by 359Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD: study design and rationale for phase 3 trials based on pooled analysis of six phase 2 randomized controlled trials

Open access
Mithoefer, Michael C., Feduccia, Allison A., Jerome, Lisa, Mithoefer, Anne, Wagner, Mark, Walsh, Zach, Hamilton, Scott, Yazar-Klosinski, Berra, Emerson, Amy, Doblin, Rick·2019·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder is a prevalent mental health condition with substantial impact on daily functioning that lacks sufficient treatment options. Here we evaluate six phase 2 trials in a pooled analysis to determine the study design for phase 3 trials of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD. METHODS: Six randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials at five study sites were conducted from April 2004 to February 2017. Active doses of MDMA (75-125 mg, n = 72) or placebo/control doses (0-40 mg, n = 31) were administered to individuals with PTSD during manualized psychotherapy sessions in two or three 8-h sessions spaced a month apart. Three non-drug 90-min therapy sessions preceded the first MDMA exposure, and three to four followed each experimental session. RESULTS: After two blinded experimental sessions, the active group had significantly greater reductions in CAPS-IV total scores from baseline than the control group [MMRM estimated mean difference (SE) between groups - 22.0 (5.17), P < 0.001]. The between-group Cohen's d effect size was 0.8, indicating a large treatment effect. After two experimental sessions, more participants in the active group (54.2%) did not meet CAPS-IV PTSD diagnostic criteria than the control group (22.6%). Depression symptom improvement on the BDI-II was greatest for the active group compared to the control group, although only trended towards significant group differences [MMRM, estimated mean difference (SE) between groups - 6.0 (3.03), P = 0.053]. All doses of MDMA were well tolerated, with some expected reactions occurring at greater frequency for the active MDMA group during experimental sessions and the 7 days following. CONCLUSIONS: MDMA-assisted psychotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in a large sample of adults with PTSD. These studies supported expansion into phase 3 trials and led to FDA granting Breakthrough Therapy designation for this promising treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00090064, NCT00353938, NCT01958593, NCT01211405, NCT01689740, NCT01793610.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-019-05249-5This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Grof S (2001) LSD psychotherapy, 4th edn. Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, Ben Lomond, CA
  2. Kadel R & Kip K (2012). A SAS macro to compute effect size (Cohen’s d) and its confidence interval from raw survey data. In Proceedings of the Annual Southeast SAS Users Group Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 359

Metadata

Authors
Mithoefer, M. C., Feduccia, A. A., Jerome, L., Mithoefer, A., Wagner, M., Walsh, Z., Hamilton, S., Yazar-Klosinski, B., Emerson, A., & Doblin, R.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (US)
  • University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Feduccia, Allison A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
236
Issue
9
Pages
2735-2745
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2944263526
Cited by
359
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 11
FWCI
53.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (X)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, MDMA, post-traumatic stress disorder, phase 3 trial design, treatment efficacy, depression symptom improvement, tolerability, breakthrough therapy designation
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Serotonin Agents, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review