Cited by 1,929Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaMigration, Health and Trauma

National Estimates of Exposure to Traumatic Events and PTSD Prevalence Using DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria: DSM-5 PTSD Prevalence

Open access
Kilpatrick, Dean G., Resnick, Heidi S., Milanak, Melissa E., Miller, Mark W., Keyes, Katherine M., Friedman, Matthew J.·2013·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) defined according to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual fifth edition (DSM-5; 2013) and fourth edition (DSM-IV; 1994) was compared in a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 2,953) recruited from an online panel. Exposure to traumatic events, PTSD symptoms, and functional impairment were assessed online using a highly structured, self-administered survey. Traumatic event exposure using DSM-5 criteria was high (89.7%), and exposure to multiple traumatic event types was the norm. PTSD caseness was determined using Same Event (i.e., all symptom criteria met to the same event type) and Composite Event (i.e., symptom criteria met to a combination of event types) definitions. Lifetime, past-12-month, and past 6-month PTSD prevalence using the Same Event definition for DSM-5 was 8.3%, 4.7%, and 3.8% respectively. All 6 DSM-5 prevalence estimates were slightly lower than their DSM-IV counterparts, although only 2 of these differences were statistically significant. DSM-5 PTSD prevalence was higher among women than among men, and prevalence increased with greater traumatic event exposure. Major reasons individuals met DSM-IV criteria, but not DSM-5 criteria were the exclusion of nonaccidental, nonviolent deaths from Criterion A, and the new requirement of at least 1 active avoidance symptom.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21848

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With 73% earning graduate or doctoral degrees, the sample represents the top 5-10% of educational attainment, and lower-than-average rates of mental illness and trauma exposure.

    “With 73% earning graduate or doctoral degrees, the sample represents the top 5–10% of educational attainment [170], and lower-than-average rates of mental illness and trauma exposure [171, 172], which are known to be inversely correlated to educational attainment [173, 174].”

    From The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists (2017) · cites this paper as [171]

    The Results (Traumatic Event Exposure) report that 89.7% of this national sample had experienced a DSM-5 Criterion A event, and the Abstract reports national PTSD prevalence estimates. These provide benchmarks for trauma exposure and PTSD, but the paper does not assess the citing authors’ sample or establish that its rates of mental illness and trauma exposure are lower than average. The educational-attainment figures and inverse-correlation claim are attached to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is evidence that the prevalence of PTSD may change somewhat with DSM-5 criteria.

    “there is evidence that the prevalence of PTSD may change somewhat with DSM-5 criteria (Kilpatrick et al., 2013)”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Kilpatrick et al., 2013

  • Persons working in public safety tend to experience PPTEs at much higher frequencies than the general public.

    “That is, persons working in public safety tend to experience PPTEs at much higher frequencies than the general public [3,4,5].”

    From Assessing the Relative Impact of Diverse Stressors among Public Safety Personnel (2020) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results section (‘Traumatic Event Exposure’; page unavailable) reports traumatic-event exposure in a national sample of U.S. adults. Searches for public-safety personnel, first responders, and occupational exposure found no comparison of their exposure frequency with that of the general public. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McFarlane AC 2011 Redefining PTSD in DSM-5: Conundrums and potentially unintended consequences Stein DJ Friedman MJ Blanco C Post-traumatic stress disorder 42 47 West Sussex, UK Wiley-Blackwell

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Milanak, M. E., Miller, M. W., Keyes, K. M., & Friedman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Kilpatrick, Dean G.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
537-547
ISSN
0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132981258
Cited by
1,929
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 195 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
59.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX000431)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000062)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018869)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023099)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029882)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD prevalence, trauma exposure, DSM-5, DSM-IV, diagnostic criteria comparison, functional disability, gender differences, avoidance symptoms, lifetime prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Death, Sudden, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review