The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated analytical microarrays: a critical review
Open accessAbstract
AbstractMicroarrays provide a powerful analytical tool for the simultaneous detection of multiple analytes in a single experiment. The specific affinity reaction of nucleic acids (hybridization) and antibodies towards antigens is the most common bioanalytical method for generating multiplexed quantitative results. Nucleic acid-based analysis is restricted to the detection of cells and viruses. Antibodies are more universal biomolecular receptors that selectively bind small molecules such as pesticides, small toxins, and pharmaceuticals and to biopolymers (e.g. toxins, allergens) and complex biological structures like bacterial cells and viruses. By producing an appropriate antibody, the corresponding antigenic analyte can be detected on a multiplexed immunoanalytical microarray. Food and water analysis along with clinical diagnostics constitute potential application fields for multiplexed analysis. Diverse fluorescence, chemiluminescence, electrochemical, and label-free microarray readout systems have been developed in the last decade. Some of them are constructed as flow-through microarrays by combination with a fluidic system. Microarrays have the potential to become widely accepted as a system for analytical applications, provided that robust and validated results on fully automated platforms are successfully generated. This review gives an overview of the current research on microarrays with the focus on automated systems and quantitative multiplexed applications. FigureMCR 3: A fully automated chemiluminescence microarray reader for analytical microarrays
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Water Analysis: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D., & Ternes, T. A. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac500508t · Cited by 2,144
Cited by
Fluorescence Quantum Yields of a Series of Red and Near-Infrared Dyes Emitting at 600−1000 nm
Rurack, K., & Spieles, M. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac101329h · Cited by 734
Surface enhanced Raman scattering for multiplexed detection
Dougan, J. A., & Faulds, K. (2012) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c2an15979a · Cited by 117
Schäferling, M., & Nagl, S. (2011) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_19 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidel, M., & Niessner, R.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2008-05-27
- Volume
- 391
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1521-1544
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W2031515697
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated analytical microarrays: a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-008-2039-3
- The paper
- Seidel, M., & Niessner, R. (2008). Automated analytical microarrays: a critical review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2039-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.