The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passive sampling as a tool for obtaining reliable analytical information in environmental quality monitoring
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occurrence of some organic UV filters in wastewater, in surface waters, and in fish from Swiss lakes
Balmer, M. E., Buser, H.-R., Müller, M. D., & Poiger, T. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es040055r · Cited by 779
Cited by
Calibration and use of the polar organic chemical integrative sampler—a critical review
Harman, C., Allan, I. J., & Vermeirssen, E. L. M. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2011 · Cited by 300
The role of microextraction techniques in occupational exposure assessment. A review
Jalili, V., Barkhordari, A., & Norouzian Baghani, A. (2019) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2019.104086 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Zabiegała, B., Kot-Wasik, A., Urbanowicz, M., & Namieśnik, J.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2009-11-19
- Volume
- 396
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-296
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W2012174004
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive sampling as a tool for obtaining reliable analytical information in environmental quality monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-009-3244-4
- The paper
- Zabiegała, B., Kot-Wasik, A., Urbanowicz, M., & Namieśnik, J. (2010). Passive sampling as a tool for obtaining reliable analytical information in environmental quality monitoring. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3244-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
