Cited by 74Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in environmental water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with solidification of floating organic droplet followed by high-performance liquid chromatography

Wu, Chunxia, Liu, Huimin, Liu, Weihua, Wu, Qiuhua, Wang, Chun, Wang, Zhi·2010·Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Abstract

A simple dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection was developed for the determination of five organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) in water samples. In this method, the extraction solvent used is of low density, low toxicity, and proper melting point near room temperature. The extractant droplet could be collected easily by solidifying it in the lower temperature. Some important experimental parameters that affect the extraction efficiencies were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear in the concentration range from 1 to 200 ng mL(-1) for the five OPs (triazophos, parathion, diazinon, phoxim, and parathion-methyl), with the correlation coefficients (r) varying from 0.9991 to 0.9998. High enrichment factors were achieved ranging from 215 to 557. The limits of detection were in the range between 0.1 and 0.3 ng mL(-1). The recoveries of the target analytes from water samples at spiking levels of 5.0 and 50.0 ng mL(-1) were 82.2-98.8% and 83.6-104.0%, respectively. The relative standard deviations fell in the range of 4.4% to 6.3%. The method was suitable for the determination of the OPs in real water samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00216-010-3790-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C., Liu, H., Liu, W., Wu, Q., Wang, C., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Hebei Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhi
Venue
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2010-05-28
Volume
397
Issue
6
Pages
2543-2549
ISSN
  • 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-2650
OpenAlex
W2039193918
Cited by
74
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
organophosphorus pesticides, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, solidification of floating organic droplet, water samples, triazophos, parathion, diazinon, phoxim, methyl parathion, pesticide residues in water, preconcentration
MeSH terms
Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Organophosphorus Compounds, Pesticides, Solvents, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Reproducibility of Results, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review