Cited by 184Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisMicrobial Inactivation MethodsFood Quality and Safety Studies

Chemical and Physical Methodologies for the Replacement/Reduction of Sulfur Dioxide Use during Winemaking: Review of Their Potentialities and Limitations

Santos, Mickael C., Nunes, Cláudia, Saraiva, Jorge A., Coimbra, Manuel A.·2012·European Food Research and Technology

Abstract

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is probably one of the most versatile and efficient additives used in winemaking due to its antiseptic and antioxidant properties. This compound is also important for minimizing phenolic polymerization rate and color loss during wine aging. However, allergies caused by SO2-derived compounds, namely the sulfites, are becoming more frequent, causing symptoms such as headaches, nausea, gastric irritation, and breathing difficulties in asthma patients. Consequently, the legislated maximum concentration of SO2 allowed in wines has been gradually reduced. For this reason, it is crucial in a competitive global winemaking market strategy, to reduce or even eliminate the use of SO2 as a preservative and to search for new healthier and safe strategies. This work gives an overview of the main methodologies that have been proposed so far and that have potential to be used in winemaking as an alternative to SO2. The addition of compounds such as dimethyl dicarbonate, bacteriocins, phenolic compounds, and lysozyme, and the use of physical methods, namely pulsed electric fields, ultrasound, ultraviolet radiation, and high pressure are discussed and critically evaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00217-011-1614-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 184

Authors
Santos, M. C., Nunes, C., Saraiva, J. A., & Coimbra, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Coimbra, Manuel A.
Venue
European Food Research and Technology
Published
2011-11-08
Volume
234
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0373-0174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-2377
  • 1438-2385
OpenAlex
W1990560335
Cited by
184
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Food Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/AGR-ALI/101251/2008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
Keywords
sulfur dioxide, winemaking, preservatives, dimethyl dicarbonate, bacteriocins, phenolic compounds, lysozyme, pulsed electric field, ultrasound, ultraviolet radiation, high pressure processing, wine aging, wine color stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review