Cited by 4Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Saccadic “inhibition” unveils the late influence of image content on oculomotor programming.

Open access
Taylor, Rebecca, Buonocore, Antimo, Fracasso, Alessio·2024·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Image content is prioritized in the visual system. Faces are a paradigmatic example, receiving preferential processing along the visual pathway compared to other visual stimuli. Moreover, face prioritization manifests also in behavior. People tend to look at faces more frequently and for longer periods, and saccadic reaction times can be faster when targeting a face as opposed to a phase-scrambled control. However, it is currently not clear at which stage image content affects oculomotor planning and execution. It can be hypothesized that image content directly influences oculomotor signal generation. Alternatively, the image content could exert its influence on oculomotor planning and execution at a later stage, after the image has been processed. Here we aim to disentangle these two alternative hypotheses by measuring the frequency of saccades toward a visual target when the latter is followed by a visual transient in the central visual field. Behaviorally, this paradigm leads to a reduction in saccade frequency that happens about 90 ms after any visual transient event, also known as saccadic "inhibition". In two experiments, we measured occurrence of saccades in visually guided saccades as well as microsaccades during fixation, using face and noise-matched visual stimuli. We observed that while the reduction in saccade occurrence was similar for both stimulus types, face stimuli lead to a prolonged reduction in eye movements. Moreover, saccade kinematics were altered by both stimulus types, showing an amplitude reduction without change in peak velocity for the earliest saccades. Taken together, our experiments imply that face stimuli primarily affect the later stages of the behavioral phenomenon of saccadic "inhibition". We propose that while some stimulus features are processed at an early stage and can quickly influence eye movements, a delayed signal conveying image content information is necessary to further inhibit/delay activity in the oculomotor system to trigger eye movements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-024-06890-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A competition between conscious and unconscious mechanisms is the predicted result, with evidence from different timescales of gaze shifts during visual search of faces.

    “A competition between mechanisms is the predicted result, evidence for which comes from the different timescales of gaze shifts during visual search of faces (Kauffman et al., 2019; Taylor et al., 2024)”

    From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2024

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that a face distractor’s effect on saccades became significant later than the distractor’s initial effect, supporting different timescales of eye-movement responses to faces. It does not describe a visual-search task or identify the effects as competition between conscious and unconscious mechanisms. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 4

Authors
Taylor, R., Buonocore, A., & Fracasso, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa (IT)
Corresponding author
Fracasso, Alessio
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2024-07-30
Volume
242
Issue
10
Pages
2281-2294
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W4401116528
Cited by
4
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S006605/1)
  • PRIN (2022_PNRR-P2022ST78T)
  • Fundação Bial (A-29315, 203/2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
saccadic inhibition, face processing, image content, saccade frequency, microsaccades, saccade kinematics, saccade amplitude, visually guided saccades, visual transients, face advantage
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Adult, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review