The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine whether prolonged, repetitive mixed nerve stimulation (duty cycle 1 s, 500 ms on–500 ms off, 10 Hz) of the ulnar nerve leads to a change in excitability of primary motor cortex in normal human subjects. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) generated in three intrinsic hand muscles [abductor digiti minimi (ADM), first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB)] by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded during complete relaxation before and after a period of prolonged repetitive ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist. Transcranial magnetic stimuli were applied at seven scalp sites separated by 1 cm: the optimal scalp site for eliciting MEPs in the target muscle (FDI), three sites medial to the optimal site and three sites lateral to the optimal stimulation site. The area of the MEPs evoked in the ulnar- (FDI, ADM) but not the median-innervated (APB) muscles was increased after prolonged ulnar nerve stimulation. Centre of gravity measures demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the distribution of cortical excitability after the peripheral stimulation. F-wave responses in the intrinsic hand muscles were not altered after prolonged ulnar nerve stimulation, suggesting that the changes in MEP areas were not the result of stimulus-induced increases in the excitability of spinal motoneurones. Control experiments employing transcranial electric stimulation provided no evidence for a spinal origin for the excitability changes. These results demonstrate that in normal human subjects the excitability of the cortical projection to hand muscles can be altered in a manner determined by the peripheral stimulus applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive
Lotze, M. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg079 · Cited by 691
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm311 · Cited by 624
Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input
Kaelin‐Lang, A., Luft, A. R., Sawaki, L., Burstein, A. H., Sohn, Y. H., & Cohen, L. G. (2002) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012801 · Cited by 423
Fraser, C., Power, M., Hamdy, S., Rothwell, J., Hobday, D., Hollander, I., Tyrell, P., Hobson, A., Williams, S., & Thompson, D. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00705-5 · Cited by 391
Lee, M., Hinder, M. R., Gandevia, S. C., & Carroll, T. J. (2010) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.183855 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Ridding, M. C., Brouwer, B., Miles, T. S., Pitcher, J. B., & Thompson, P. D.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-143
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W1969082818
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s002219900269
- The paper
- Ridding, M. C., Brouwer, B., Miles, T. S., Pitcher, J. B., & Thompson, P. D. (2000). Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002219900269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.