Cited by 138Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesMarine and coastal plant biologyMarine Biology and Ecology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How an introduced seaweed can affect epibiota diversity in different coastal systems

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00227-005-0128-9

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Buschbaum C (2002) Siedlungsmuster und Wechselbeziehungen von Seepocken (Cirripedia) auf Muschelbänken (Mytilus edulis L.) im Wattenmeer. Ber Polarforsch Meeresforsch 408:1–143
  2. Buschbaum C (2005) Pest oder Bereicherung? Der eingeschleppte japanische Beerentang Sargassum muticum an der deutschen Nordseeküste. Natur und Museum 135:216–221
  3. Nienburg W (1925) Eine eigenartige Lebensgemeinschaft zwischen Fucus und Mytilus. Ber Dt Bot Ges 43:292–298
  4. Nienburg W (1927) Zur Ökologie der Flora des Wattenmeeres. 1. Teil: Der Königshafen bei List auf Sylt. Wiss Meeresunters Kiel 20:146–196
  5. Reichert K (2003) Die Makrofauna und ihre räumliche Verteilung und saisonale Veränderung im Felswatt von Helgoland. MSc Thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany
  6. Reise K (1994) Changing life under the tides of the Wadden Sea during the 20th century. Ophelia Suppl 6:117–125
  7. Schories D, Albrecht A (1996) Sargassum muticum—Der japanische Beerentang im deutschen Wattenmeer. Natur und Museum 125(3):92–98
  8. Wurster P (1962) Geologisches Portrait Helgolands. Die Natur 70:135–150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 138

Metadata

Authors
Buschbaum, C., Chapman, A. S., & Saier, B.
Affiliations
  • Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Buschbaum, Christian
Venue
Marine Biology
Published
2005-11-22
Volume
148
Issue
4
Pages
743-754
ISSN
  • 0025-3162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1793
OpenAlex
W2160811181
Cited by
137
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
Sargassum muticum, invasive seaweed, introduced species, biodiversity impacts, Halidrys siliquosa, Fucus vesiculosus, rocky shores, sandy beaches, habitat heterogeneity, species richness, community structure, North Sea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review